ReactiveX Reviews

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

ReactiveX mentions (38)

• Understanding DynamicData in .NET: Reactive Data Management Made Easy

  DynamicData is a .NET library that brings the power of reactive programming to collections. It is built upon the principles of Reactive Extensions (Rx), extending these concepts to handle collections like lists and observables more efficiently and flexibly. DynamicData provides a set of tools and extensions that enable developers to manage collections reactively, meaning any changes in the data are automatically... - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago

• What is your preferred asynchronous programming library?

  Another option is to use the RxJava library in Java. This library uses reactive programming principles to make it easy to write asynchronous and event-driven code. It's particularly well-suited for handling streams of data and allows you to write code that is both efficient and easy to read. Source: about 1 year ago

• Brett Slatkin: Why am I building a new functional programming language?

  The thing that really irks me is that the generator pattern doesn't have to be an OO-first feature. Observable streams[1] work with the same basic foundation and those are awesome for FP. [1]: https://reactivex.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• What Are Signals?

  > I’m not sure what you mean by "Rx" in this context. From “reactive extensions”, a proper name for a family of libraries[1] (RxJava, Rx.NET, RxJS), AFAICT one of the first attempted implementations of mature FRP ideas in the imperative world and one messy enough that it took React for anything similar to reënter the mainstream. Compare the enthusiastic HN reception of “Deprecating the observer pattern” in... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Why do so many Unity tutorials teach the observer pattern?

  Here’s what you can do with the observer pattern — https://reactivex.io/. Source: over 1 year ago

Apache HTTP Server mentions (50)

• The 2024 Web Hosting Report

  Single-page applications (SPAs) existed before S3, but given that you still had to set up, scale, and maintain servers using something like Apache or NGINX in order to serve them, the advantages for “Ops” or “DevOps” were not so different to running a “real server” with a language like PHP, python, or Java. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  Both Docusaurus and Starlight generate static sites. This means that theoretically, they can be deployed on any platform that supports deploying static sites (like Apache or NGINX). But both of them provide a significantly better developer experience if we deploy on their recommended platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• BCHS stack: BSD, C, httpd, SQLite

  Simiplicity is nice, but there are reasons why Perl and PHP were the popular choices for web stacks in the early 2000's--they are faster and easier to develop with than C and likely safer than C too. Mod_perl (https://perl.apache.org/) and mod_php (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=115522403#content/view/115522403) helped to make Apache httpd (https://httpd.apache.org/) the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Apache HTTP Server: An Overview of the Open Source Web Server for Multiple Platforms

  The Apache HTTP Server project was initially launched in 1995 by a group of web developers and administrators who sought to improve upon the existing web server software available at the time. The project has since evolved into a collaborative effort, with contributors from around the world working together to maintain and enhance the server. Today, the Apache HTTP Server is managed by the Apache Software... Source: about 1 year ago

• Selfmade PVE-Rack

  Apache websites of friends and acquaintances. Source: about 1 year ago