Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

react-testing-library VS stylelint

Compare react-testing-library VS stylelint and see what are their differences

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

stylelint logo stylelint

stylelint is a modern CSS linter
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21
  • stylelint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-01

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

stylelint features and specs

  • Highly Configurable
    Stylelint offers extensive configuration options, allowing developers to customize rules to fit the specific coding style and standards of their projects.
  • Extensive Rule Set
    With a broad collection of rules, developers can enforce best practices, catch potential errors, and maintain consistent code style across the project.
  • Plugin Support
    Stylelint supports plugins, enabling developers to extend its functionality and integrate with other tools seamlessly.
  • Active Community and Maintenance
    Stylelint is supported by an active community that contributes to its development, ensuring it stays up-to-date with the latest CSS standards and practices.
  • Integration with Other Tools
    Stylelint can be integrated with various development tools and text editors, making it easier for developers to incorporate it into their existing workflow.

Possible disadvantages of stylelint

  • Complex Configuration
    The high level of configurability can lead to complexity, requiring a steep learning curve for new users to understand and set up rules.
  • Performance Concerns with Large Codebases
    Stylelint can potentially slow down in very large projects, as it processes and analyzes a significant amount of code data.
  • Limited Support for Non-CSS Syntax
    While Stylelint can be configured to support various CSS-like syntaxes, it might not provide as robust support for non-standard or newer syntaxes as native handling.
  • Requires Manual Updating
    To benefit from new rules or performance improvements, users may need to manually update Stylelint and its configurations frequently.
  • Overhead for Small Projects
    For small projects, setting up and maintaining Stylelint might add unnecessary overhead due to its extensive features and options.

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

stylelint videos

Stylelint ( By Andrey Sitnik at CSSParis #6 )

More videos:

  • Review - Stylelint — как и зачем линтить CSS (Андрей Ситник) - TK Conf

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to react-testing-library and stylelint)
Developer Tools
74 74%
26% 26
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using react-testing-library and stylelint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library should be more popular than stylelint. It has been mentiond 133 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

stylelint mentions (28)

  • Improving Code Quality with Linting
    You can even lint your stylesheets if you're working with CSS. One of my favourite tools for that is Stylelint. Similar to ESLint, it's configuration-based and lets you define what rules you want to include, it also has a recommended configuration that you can extend from. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • CSS Variable Naming: Best Practices and Approaches
    Stylelint: A modern, flexible linter for CSS that can be configured to check variable consistency. PostCSS: A tool that transforms CSS with plugins, including variable checks. CSS Linter: A specific tool to ensure correct and consistent use of CSS variables. Conclusion 🔗. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • BEM Modifiers in Pure CSS Nesting
    Once upon a time, when native CSS nesting was just starting to be discussed, I thought, "Nesting? In pure CSS? I will never use that!" But over time, I got used to it, and now I even like it. Will the same happen with native CSS mixins, or, heaven forbid, native CSS loops? I want to say no, but I will not make predictions. At the very least, with experience, I have become acquainted with a wonderful tool like... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Streamline Your Workflow: A Guide to Normalising Git Commit and Push Processes
    There are more linting tools that I won't go into deeply, but you can integrate them with lint-staged. For example, you can lint your CSS content with Stylelint, or even lint your README files with markdownlint, etc. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Why it is Important to Update Linters and How to Do it Right
    Another common way to extend configs in linters is using the extends key in the configuration file. Let's take StyleLint as an example:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing react-testing-library and stylelint, you can also consider the following products

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.