Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

react-testing-library VS MERNKIT

Compare react-testing-library VS MERNKIT and see what are their differences

Momen
Build powerful web apps, and create your custom AI apps, no code needed! featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

MERNKIT logo MERNKIT

SaaS Boilerplate for MERN Stack - MongoDB, Node.js, React.js - Stripe, Authentication, User Management, Beautiful UI - Focus on features!
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21
  • MERNKIT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-26

react-testing-library

Website
testing-library.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

MERNKIT

Website
mernkit.com
Pricing URL
Official MERNKIT Pricing
$ Details
paid $9.99 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser
Release Date
2020 July
Edit details

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

MERNKIT features and specs

  • Subscriptions
  • Facebook Authentication
  • Google Authentication
  • React UI

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

react-testing-library videos

+ Add

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

MERNKIT videos

No MERNKIT videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to react-testing-library and MERNKIT)

react-testing-library

MERNKIT

Developer Tools
73 73%
Developer Tools
27% 27
Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0
Application Builder
0 0%
Application Builder
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using react-testing-library and MERNKIT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 133 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

MERNKIT mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MERNKIT yet. Tracking of MERNKIT recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing react-testing-library and MERNKIT, you can also consider the following products

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

UseGravity.App - Build a Node.js & React app at warp speed with a SaaS boilerplate

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

ExpoShip - Ship your app in days, not weeks. The React Native boilerplate with all you need to build your app and make your first money online fast.

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

Modern MERN - React SaaS Starter Kit built with TypeScript and Next.js styled with Tailwind CSS hosted on AWS. MERN stack using Prisma and Serverless.

Loading...