react-testing-library VS JSPM

React Testing Library - https://testing-library.com/docs/react-testing-library/intro/. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

React Testing Library: provides utilities to make testing easier. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Since we are testing the front-end, we will also rely on the React Testing Library, which provides support for rendering components and custom queries in the DOM. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

It’s not to say 100% coverage is the way to go, but at least some functional testing with something like react-testing-library and cypress can save a lot of time. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

If you happen to be using React Testing Library in your project, you'll need to keep the jsdom dev dependency installed. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

> We've been working on some updates that will allow Deno to easily import npm packages and make the vast majority of npm packages work in Deno within the next three months. This is really huge and will be a huge boost to the Deno ecosystem. On the other hand, I quite enjoyed that it wasn't jacked into NPM. There were reasonable alternatives like https://jspm.org/. This is a big swing at Node and I'll be watching... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

But I really want to make it clear that I'm so incredibly proud of this project and the people who have contributed to it. Snowpack meaningfully pushed the entire web development industry forward, and that's pretty cool. Even if you never use Snowpack directly, the work that we pioneered around npm package handling for ESM is already being built on and improved on across the entire web tooling landscape in... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago