React Native Desktop VS The State of JavaScript 2018

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native

Discover the latest trends in the JavaScript ecosystem

Cross-Platform Code Sharing
React Native Desktop allows for code sharing between mobile and desktop platforms, reducing development time and effort. This promotes a unified codebase across iOS, Android, and macOS platforms.
React Ecosystem
Developers can leverage the extensive ecosystem of React and React Native, including libraries, tools, and community support, thus simplifying development and benefiting from existing solutions.
Hot Reloading
React Native Desktop supports hot reloading, which allows developers to see changes immediately without rebuilding the whole application. This greatly enhances development speed and productivity.
Native Performance
React Native Desktop aims to deliver a performance close to native applications on macOS, allowing for smooth user experience and efficient utilization of the system's resources.

Immature Project
React Native Desktop is still a relatively young project compared to its mobile counterpart. It may lack some stability, advanced features, and support that are available in more mature frameworks.
Learning Curve
Developers familiar with only web development might find it challenging to adapt to React Native's paradigms and native coding patterns required for desktop applications.
Limited macOS-Specific Components
There might be fewer out-of-the-box components and libraries tailored for macOS when compared to those available for mobile, requiring more custom implementation work.
No Official Support
As an open-source project, React Native Desktop doesn't have official support from Facebook or a large organization, which might lead to slower updates and a greater reliance on community contributions.

Comprehensive Data
The survey offers a wide range of data on JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and tools, providing a broad overview of the ecosystem in 2018.
Community Insights
It offers insights directly from JavaScript developers, reflecting trends, preferences, and challenges faced by the community.
Historical Reference
Serves as a historical reference point to track the evolution and adoption of different technologies in the JavaScript world over the years.
Visual Presentation
Includes charts and graphs that make the information easy to digest and understand trends quickly.
Segmented Analysis
Provides segmented analysis of different aspects of JavaScript such as frameworks, testing, state management, etc., for more targeted insights.

Potential Bias
The survey could be subject to self-selection bias, as it depends on who chooses to participate.
Time-Sensitive Data
Being from 2018, the survey data is outdated, and the JavaScript ecosystem evolves rapidly, possibly limiting its current relevance.
Limited Demographics
May not accurately represent all JavaScript developers globally, particularly those from underrepresented regions or communities.
Depth vs. Breadth
While comprehensive, some areas may lack depth in insights compared to focused, specialized surveys or studies.
Interpretation Challenges
The results and trends can be challenging to interpret without considering external factors influencing the JavaScript ecosystem.