Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RawGit VS intercooler.js

Compare RawGit VS intercooler.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RawGit logo RawGit

RawGit serves raw files directly from GitHub with proper content-type headers.

intercooler.js logo intercooler.js

Simple, declarative AJAX using HTML attributes
  • RawGit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-23
  • intercooler.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

RawGit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    RawGit provides an easy way to serve files directly from a GitHub repository with simple URL access, requiring minimal setup.
  • Convenient for Demos
    It allows developers to quickly demo a webpage or tool hosted in a GitHub repository without deploying it to a dedicated server.
  • CORS Support
    RawGit has Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers enabled, which makes it easier to include resources hosted on GitHub into web projects.

Possible disadvantages of RawGit

  • Not Suitable for Production
    RawGit explicitly states that it is not intended for production use due to lack of scalability and potential reliability issues.
  • Limited Bandwidth
    The service is limited by bandwidth and usage restrictions, which may result in files being inaccessible if usage exceeds certain limits.
  • Deprecation Warning
    As of the last updates, RawGit announced it was shutting down and encouraged users to switch to alternative solutions for hosting files.

intercooler.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RawGit videos

Host a CSS or JS file on Gist and redirect through RawGit CDN

intercooler.js videos

Carson Gross - Intercooler.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RawGit and intercooler.js)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
CDN
100 100%
0% 0
JS Library
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RawGit and intercooler.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, intercooler.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RawGit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RawGit yet. Tracking of RawGit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

intercooler.js mentions (9)

  • How do you do, fellow web developers? A growing disconnect
    Regardless of what CSS query you use to look the element up, in the jquery example you'd still have your logic (the url, etc) defined elsewhere the htmx version is symmetric with the href attribute in that it completely specifies what is going to happen directly on the element itself of course you could do something in jquery like using a data attribute to store the url and HTTP method, etc, but at that point... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Htmx and the Rule of Least Power
    An early version of Htmx was in fact based on jQuery (https://intercoolerjs.org). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails
    I used HTMX since the intercooler days [0] but the stuff you can make is rather limited. Also you still need the JS to deal with a11y things like expanded state (or hyperscript, apparently). If you have a lot of components to implement, everything requires thinking. I really love it for simple applications though. Resist implementing a complicated menu, live notifications, an editable data-table and such... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Htmx is part of the GitHub Accelerator
    To an extent, there was `jQuery.get` but it wasn't tightly integrated with HTML the original version of htmx was intercooler.js: https://intercoolerjs.org released in 2013, and that version depended on jQuery. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Htmx is part of the GitHub Accelerator
    :) hyperscript came after htmx htmx is version 2 of intercoolerjs: https://intercoolerjs.org which had a proto-scripting language in it, the `ic-action` attribute: https://intercoolerjs.org/attributes/ic-action I dropped that attribute (along w/ the jQuery dependency) when I created htmx, but I felt there was some merit to the idea of a lightweight scripting language that abstracted away async behavior. Once htmx... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RawGit and intercooler.js, you can also consider the following products

Statically - The free optimization & CDN for images, CSS, JavaScript, and open source.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

raw.githack.com - raw.githack.com serves raw files from github.com with proper Content-Type headers (like rawgit.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

jsDelivr - A free, fast, and reliable Open Source CDN for npm and GitHub with the largest network and best performance from all OSS CDNs. Serving 100 billion requests per month.

BULLETWEEK.app - BULLETWEEK - the GTD app inspired by the Bullet Journal