Raw.githack.com — A modern replacement of rawgit.com which simply hosts file using Cloudflare. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Of course, it's nicer to just link files from a CDN, so I created a gist and use https://raw.githack.com/ to serve the file from there. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

It uses raw.githack.com to convert Github HTML code to web format. Source: about 2 years ago

There's a website called Codeberg that is open source and based in Germany, the site pretty much work as an open source alternative to Github and Gitlab by cooperating the same way as they do with the "Git" program. I've came across some websites like https://gitcdn.link/ and https://raw.githack.com/, but they only work with specific websites and not for Codeberg. Source: over 2 years ago

Combined with https://raw.githack.com/, this might even make zsync use possible as well! Source: over 2 years ago

# See https://pre-commit.com for more information # See https://pre-commit.com/hooks.html for more hooks Repos: - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks rev: v3.2.0 hooks: - id: trailing-whitespace - id: end-of-file-fixer - id: check-yaml - id: check-toml - id: check-added-large-files - repo: local hooks: - id: tox lint name: tox-validation ... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

Pre-commit hooks act as the first line of defense in maintaining code quality, seamlessly integrating with linters and code formatters. They automatically execute these tools each time a developer tries to commit code to the repository, ensuring the code adheres to the project's standards. If the hooks detect issues, the commit is paused until the issues are resolved, guaranteeing that only code meeting quality... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

Https://pre-commit.com/ can (and probably should) be used with any editor for such things. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Pre-commit Hooks: Pre-commit is a tool that can be set up to enforce coding rules and standards before you commit your changes to your code repository. This ensures that you can't even check in (commit) code that doesn't meet your standards. This allows a code reviewer to focus on the architecture of a change while not wasting time with trivial style nitpicks. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

Ah, fair enough! On my team we use pre-commit[0] a lot. I guess I would define the history to be something like "has this commit ever been run through our pre-commit hooks?". If you rewrite history, you'll (usually) produce commits that have not been through pre-commit (and they've therefore dodged a lot of static checks that might catch code that wasn't working, at that point in time). That gives some manner of... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago