Based on our record, Hurl.dev seems to be a lot more popular than RapidAPI for Teams. While we know about 39 links to Hurl.dev, we've tracked only 2 mentions of RapidAPI for Teams. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I was really disappointed with the Rapid API buyout, but anyway, the client for Mac seems essentially unchanged, is the good news. The weird thing is that I can find NO mention of the client on their site: https://rapidapi.com/products/build-apis/ Which, to me, is a bad sign. I suspect someday I'll be forced to give it up. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
That sounds exactly what we are offering at RapidAPI (https://rapidapi.com/products/teams/). It is completely free for up to 5 team members, built-in analytics, cloud gateway, and more. Source: almost 3 years ago
You may be able to replace some of your curl+shell with Hurl — https://hurl.dev/#also-an-http-test-tool . - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Shameless promotion: Hurl [1] is an Open Source cli using libcurl to run and tests HTTP requests with plain text! We use libcurl for the super reliability and top features (HTTP/3 for instance) and we've added little features like: - requests chaining, - capturing and passing data from a response to another request, - response tests (JSONPath, XPath, etc...) There is nice syntax sugar for resuesting... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
- This too will suffer the same fate as the previous two and will gradually also adopt a busy, unworkable, confusing UI This is why I’ve started using Hurl because that doesn’t even have a UI. Bonus: can be kept in source control and run as part of CI/CD. https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/ https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Testing our application is a matter of running npm run start:dev and making requests to it. To test it better I'll leave a Hurl file in the repository that you can use to test the API. You can run it using hurl --test ./collection.hurl. This will run all the tests and make sure that everything is working as expected. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
RapidAPI - API marketplace for finding and connecting to the world's top APIs.
Insomnia REST - The most intuitive cross-platform REST API Client ð´
Fieldbook API - A database with an API, as simple as a spreadsheet
Paw.cloud - Paw is a REST client for Mac.
Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development
Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem