Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Random User-Agent VS Greasemonkey

Compare Random User-Agent VS Greasemonkey and see what are their differences

Random User-Agent logo Random User-Agent

Automatically change the user agent after specified period of time to a randomly selected one, thus...

Greasemonkey logo Greasemonkey

Customize the way a web page displays or behaves, by using small bits of JavaScript.
  • Random User-Agent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • Greasemonkey Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

Random User-Agent features and specs

  • Privacy Enhancement
    Random User-Agent helps in enhancing user privacy by rotating user-agent strings, making it harder for trackers to build a consistent profile of the user.
  • Bypass Basic Scraping Restrictions
    By changing user-agent strings frequently, Random User-Agent can help bypass basic scraping restrictions implemented by some websites.
  • Improved Testing
    It allows developers to test how their websites behave across different browsers and devices by simulating various user-agent strings.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, it provides transparency and the opportunity for users to inspect and contribute to the codebase.
  • Flexibility
    Users can customize the list of user-agent strings to include ones that suit their specific needs or target different scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of Random User-Agent

  • Website Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly if they are presented with outdated or unsupported user-agent strings.
  • Potential for Abuse
    The tool could be used for unethical purposes, such as circumventing access restrictions or malicious web scraping, leading to potential abuse.
  • Increased Detection Risk
    Some advanced anti-bot systems may detect the frequent change in user-agent strings as suspicious behavior, potentially blocking access.
  • Reduced Performance
    For applications heavily relying on a consistent user-agent for caching or optimization, changing these strings randomly could lead to reduced performance.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Maintaining an up-to-date list of user-agent strings requires ongoing effort to ensure compatibility with the latest browser versions.

Greasemonkey features and specs

  • Customization
    Greasemonkey allows users to customize the appearance and functionality of a website by injecting JavaScript code, offering a high degree of personalization.
  • User Community
    A large community of users and developers contributes to a vast library of scripts, enabling users to easily find and install scripts that meet their needs.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Greasemonkey encourages transparency and collaboration, allowing developers to contribute and improve the functionality of the extension.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Greasemonkey scripts are compatible with most modern browsers through various extensions, allowing scripts to work across different systems.

Possible disadvantages of Greasemonkey

  • Security Risks
    Scripts can potentially contain malicious code, leading to security vulnerabilities if users install scripts from untrusted sources.
  • Script Maintenance
    Users may need to maintain or update scripts themselves, especially when websites update their layout or functionality, causing existing scripts to break.
  • Limited Browser Support
    While Greasemonkey is primarily designed for Firefox, users of other browsers might need to use alternative extensions like Tampermonkey, which may not support all features of Greasemonkey.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who wish to create or modify scripts need a good understanding of JavaScript, which may pose a challenge to those less familiar with coding.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Random User-Agent and Greasemonkey)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Extension
40 40%
60% 60
Dark Mode
42 42%
58% 58
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Random User-Agent and Greasemonkey. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Random User-Agent should be more popular than Greasemonkey. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Random User-Agent mentions (2)

  • make a website believe you‘re using windows
    Use the following extension and set a Windows user agent: https://github.com/tarampampam/random-user-agent. Source: about 2 years ago
  • The metaverse is bullshit
    It still doesn't make you safe from being tracked, it only makes you harder to track through fingerprinting and there are other methods to track you as well. A similar extension is also available for other browsers. Source: over 3 years ago

Greasemonkey mentions (1)

  • Auto-redirect from English to Simple English if such an article exist in Simple English
    // ==UserScript== // @name Wikipedia Redirect // @namespace https://greasespot.net // @version 0.1 // @description Redirect from English Wikipedia to Simple English Wikipedia if the page exists // @author Noname // @match https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/* // @grant none // ==/UserScript== (function() { 'use strict'; let currentURL = window.location.href; let... Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Random User-Agent and Greasemonkey, you can also consider the following products

30 Seconds of Knowledge - Become a better developer, in every new tab.

Tampermonkey - Greasemonkey compatible script manager.

User-Agent Switcher and Manager - spoofs browser's User-Agent string.

Violentmonkey - Violentmonkey is a userscript manager to support running userscripts in web pages.

Chameleon WebExtension - Chameleon is a Firefox extension to Spoof your browser profile.

Userscripts - An open-source userscript editor for Safari.