RAML VS Dhall Configuration Language

This happened when I was working for one of my previous employers. I had just joined the company and was working on a microservice that was consuming a REST api exposed by another microservice. There was this JIRA ticket I was working on and I was not sure about the data model exposed by this REST api call. At this point in time the adoption to OpenAPI / Swagger / RAML was just beginning. I was new and was... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Provide consistent and easy-to-use documentation. Provide an OpenAPI or RAML file that describes your API and the endpoints. Also, provide easy-to-use interactive online API documentation like Swagger if possible. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

Agda doesn't need that restriction, as far as I know. And neither does Dhall. See https://dhall-lang.org/ Neither language is Turing complete. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Kubernetes config is a decent example. I had ChatGPT generate a representative silly example -- the content doesn't matter so much as the structure: https://gist.github.com/cstrahan/528b00cd5c3a22e3d8f057bb1a75ea61 Now consider 100s (if not 1000s) of such files. I haven't given Pkl an in depth look yet, but I can say that the Industry Standard™ of "simple YAML" + string substitution (with delicate, error prone... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Fail to see how this is any different than Dhall (https://dhall-lang.org/) other than it produces plists too. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Well, Dhall provides something between JSON and a Turing complete language that can make a lot of configuration much quicker to write, if you can hack the functional syntax. http://dhall-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

What are your thoughts on: - https://dhall-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago