Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RabbitMQ VS vert.x

Compare RabbitMQ VS vert.x and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

vert.x logo vert.x

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • vert.x Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-12

RabbitMQ features and specs

  • Reliability
    RabbitMQ ensures message durability by persisting messages to disk. This enhances reliability, especially for critical applications where message loss is unacceptable.
  • Flexibility
    RabbitMQ supports multiple messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, and STOMP, allowing diverse applications to communicate seamlessly.
  • Advanced Features
    RabbitMQ offers rich features such as message routing, delivery acknowledgments, and clustering, which can satisfy complex messaging needs.
  • Ease of Use
    RabbitMQ provides extensive documentation and user-friendly management tools, making it accessible for developers and administrators.
  • Scalability
    Its clustering and federated queues capabilities allow RabbitMQ to scale both vertically and horizontally to handle increased loads.
  • Transaction Support
    RabbitMQ provides support for transactions, ensuring that a series of operations can be executed atomically, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.

Possible disadvantages of RabbitMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring RabbitMQ can be complex, especially for users who are unfamiliar with messaging brokers or have limited experience with it.
  • Overhead
    RabbitMQ can introduce overhead in terms of latency and resource consumption, which might be an issue for high-performance applications requiring low latency.
  • Maintenance
    Maintaining RabbitMQ, including tasks such as monitoring, managing clusters, and handling updates, requires ongoing effort and expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its feature-rich nature and various configurations, there can be a steep learning curve for new users to master RabbitMQ.
  • Performance Issues with High Volume
    In extremely high-volume scenarios, RabbitMQ may experience performance bottlenecks and memory issues, requiring careful tuning and scaling strategies.
  • Security Considerations
    Proper security configuration, including user roles, permissions, and encryption, is essential but can be complex and critical for preventing unauthorized access.

vert.x features and specs

  • Performance
    Vert.x is designed to be highly performant, leveraging a non-blocking, event-driven architecture which makes it suitable for handling many concurrent requests efficiently.
  • Polyglot
    Vert.x supports multiple programming languages, including Java, Kotlin, JavaScript, Groovy, Ruby, and more. This allows developers to use the language they are most comfortable with.
  • Modular
    Vert.x is modular and lightweight, enabling developers to use only the parts they need and easily integrate with other libraries and tools.
  • Reactive Ecosystem
    Vert.x provides a robust ecosystem for building reactive applications, including asynchronous APIs, event bus, and reactive streams.
  • Scalability
    The architecture of Vert.x allows for easy scaling both vertically and horizontally, as it can efficiently manage resources and load balancing.

Possible disadvantages of vert.x

  • Learning Curve
    The event-driven and asynchronous nature of Vert.x can be challenging for developers who are accustomed to traditional synchronous programming paradigms.
  • Community and Resources
    While growing, the Vert.x community is smaller compared to more established frameworks, which may result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
  • Complexity
    As applications grow in size, managing asynchronous code and callback structures can become complex, requiring careful planning and architecture decisions.
  • Tooling
    Tooling support, while improving, may not be as comprehensive as other established frameworks, which might impact development speed and debugging.

Analysis of RabbitMQ

Overall verdict

  • Yes, RabbitMQ is a good choice for most message brokering needs, especially when the requirements include high reliability, ease of integration, and support for complex messaging patterns. Its wide adoption in the industry and active community support make it a trusted solution.

Why this product is good

  • RabbitMQ is a robust message broker that supports multiple messaging protocols, making it highly versatile for various applications. It is known for its reliability, scalability, and ease of use. RabbitMQ provides strong support for clustering and is highly available, ensuring that messages are reliably delivered even in case of node failures. Additionally, it has a rich ecosystem with a plethora of plugins and integrations with other software, making it a flexible choice for different use cases.

Recommended for

    RabbitMQ is recommended for businesses and developers who need a reliable message broker for microservices architecture, asynchronous processing, or distributed systems. It is well-suited for both small-scale projects that need easy setup and enterprise-level applications that demand high throughput and low latency.

RabbitMQ videos

+ Add

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ？？

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

vert.x videos

+ Add

From Zero to Back End in 45 Minutes with Eclipse Vert.x

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RabbitMQ and vert.x)

RabbitMQ

vert.x

Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Developer Tools
62 62%
Developer Tools
38% 38

User comments

Share your experience with using RabbitMQ and vert.x. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RabbitMQ and vert.x

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

vert.x Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
As Vert.x is an event-driven and non-blocking framework, it can handle a lot of concurrencies using only a minimal number of threads. Vert.x is also quite lightweight, with the core framework weighing only about 650 KB. It has a modular architecture that allows you to use only the modules you need so that your app can stay as slick as possible. Vert.x is an ideal choice if...
Source: raygun.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, vert.x seems to be a lot more popular than RabbitMQ. While we know about 29 links to vert.x, we've tracked only 1 mention of RabbitMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

vert.x mentions (29)

  • Java News: WildFly 36, Spring Milestones, and Open Liberty Updates
    The sixth release candidate of Eclipse Vert.x 5.0.0 provides support for the Java Platform Module System and a new VerticleBase class. Further details are available in the release notes. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Rust, C++, and Python trends in jobs on Hacker News (February 2025)
    I see your point, but I still don't think you can just say "If you want to get get a job as a Go developer, you must know gRPC." Even more so for Kafka, I've only heard about it being popular in the Java world. You can't even say "If you want to get a job as a Java developer, you must know Spring." Nowadays, sane Java projects use https://vertx.io, it's just too good. I would argue that Spring is for legacy... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Error handlers and failure handlers in Vert.x
    Vert.x is a toolkit for developing reactive applications on the JVM. I wrote a short introductory post about it earlier, when I used it for a commercial project. I had to revisit a Vert.x-based hobby project a few weeks ago, and I learned that there were some gaps in my knowledge about how Vert.x handles failures and errors. To fill those gaps, I did some experiments, wrote a few tests, and then wrote this blog post. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Spark – A web micro framework for Java and Kotlin
    Https://vertx.io/ It's actively maintained with full time developers, performant, supports Kotlin out of the box, and has more features? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Reactive database access on the JVM
    Hibernate Reactive integrates with Vert.x, but an extension allows to bridge to Project Reactor if wanted. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RabbitMQ and vert.x, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Micronaut Framework - Build modular easily testable microservice & serverless apps

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Javalin - Simple REST APIs for Java and Kotlin

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

helidon - Helidon Project, Java libraries crafted for Microservices

Loading...