Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RabbitMQ VS Redpanda

Compare RabbitMQ VS Redpanda and see what are their differences

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Redpanda logo Redpanda

Redpanda is a powerful, yet simple, and cost-efficient streaming data platform that is compatible with Kafka® APIs while eliminating Kafka complexity.
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
Not present

RabbitMQ videos

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ??

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Redpanda videos

No Redpanda videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RabbitMQ and Redpanda)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
76 76%
24% 24
Web Service Automation
Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing

User comments

Share your experience with using RabbitMQ and Redpanda. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RabbitMQ and Redpanda

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Redpanda Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
Redpanda message queue allows multiple producers to write messages to a single topic, and multiple consumers to read messages from that topic in parallel. Messages can be buffered in memory for fast delivery and persist to disk for durability. Redpanda also provides a number of features, such as replication, partitioning, and compression, to help manage large amounts of data.
Source: docs.vanus.ai

Social recommendations and mentions

Redpanda might be a bit more popular than RabbitMQ. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to RabbitMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

Redpanda mentions (1)

  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Stream-processing platforms such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, or Redpanda are specifically engineered to foster event-driven communication in a distributed system and they can be a great choice for developing loosely coupled applications. Stream processing platforms analyze data in motion, offering near-zero latency advantages. For example, consider an alert system for monitoring factory equipment. If a... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RabbitMQ and Redpanda, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Apache Pulsar - Apache Pulsar is an open-source, distributed messaging and streaming platform built for the cloud.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

NATS - NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices