Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Quixel Suite VS Mudbox

Compare Quixel Suite VS Mudbox and see what are their differences

3D Cityplanner
Transforming urban planning with smarter designs, data-driven decisions, and sustainable solutions for the cities of tomorrow. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Quixel Suite logo Quixel Suite

Megascans · Tutorials · Community · Support & Contact · Login · Quixel Logo · Megascans · Tutorials · Community · Support & Contact; 40% OFF; Buy Now · Login.

Mudbox logo Mudbox

Autodesk Mudbox digital sculpting and texture painting software provides 3D artists with an intuitive toolset for creating highly detailed 3D geometry and textures.
  • Quixel Suite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-13
  • Mudbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

Quixel Suite features and specs

  • High-Quality Textures
    Quixel Suite offers an extensive library of high-resolution, photorealistic textures that allow users to create highly detailed and realistic 3D models.
  • Integration with Unreal Engine
    Quixel Suite integrates seamlessly with Unreal Engine, enabling users to quickly import and apply textures to their projects, streamlining the workflow process.
  • Megascans Library
    The suite includes access to the Megascans library, a vast repository of scanned assets that can be used to enrich 3D environments and models with real-world detail.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Quixel Suite provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced artists to create and apply textures efficiently.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is frequently updated with new features, bug fixes, and additional content, ensuring users always have access to the latest tools and improvements.

Possible disadvantages of Quixel Suite

  • Subscription Cost
    Quixel Suite operates on a subscription model, which can become costly over time, especially for individual freelancers or small studios.
  • Hardware Requirements
    The software requires high-performance hardware to run smoothly, which might necessitate upgrades for users with older systems.
  • Learning Curve
    While user-friendly, mastering the full potential of Quixel Suite can take some time, requiring users to invest effort into understanding its various tools and features.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Quixel Suite relies on internet connectivity for accessing the Megascans library and some other features, which can be a limitation in offline scenarios.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, which might slow down other applications running simultaneously, particularly on less powerful machines.

Mudbox features and specs

  • Advanced Sculpting Tools
    Mudbox provides a wide range of sculpting tools that allow artists to create intricate and highly detailed models.
  • High-Resolution Texturing
    The software supports high-resolution texturing, allowing users to paint directly onto 3D models for realistic and detailed textures.
  • Integration with Autodesk Suite
    Seamless integration with other Autodesk software like Maya and 3ds Max enables a streamlined workflow for 3D artists and designers.
  • Layer-Based Workflow
    Mudbox features a layer-based workflow for both sculpting and painting, which provides flexibility and non-destructive editing capabilities.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The intuitive and user-friendly interface makes it easier for artists to focus on creativity rather than overcoming a steep learning curve.

Possible disadvantages of Mudbox

  • System Resource Intensive
    Mudbox can be demanding on system resources, requiring a powerful computer to run smoothly, especially with high-poly models.
  • Limited Animation Tools
    Unlike some competitors, Mudbox lacks comprehensive animation tools, making it less suitable for projects requiring animation.
  • Subscription-Based Pricing
    The software is offered on a subscription basis, which can become costly over time and is less appealing for some users compared to perpetual licenses.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic tools are easy to use, mastering the advanced features and capabilities can take significant time and effort.
  • Lack of Innovation
    Some users feel that Mudbox has not seen significant updates or innovations in recent years, making it less competitive compared to other 3D sculpting tools.

Analysis of Quixel Suite

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Quixel Suite is considered good, especially for artists focused on creating realistic 3D environments. The extensive library, combined with its user-friendly interface and integration capabilities, makes it a valuable tool for many in the visual arts industry.

Why this product is good

  • Quixel Suite is regarded as a powerful tool for creating high-quality textures and materials. It provides users with extensive libraries of assets and integrates smoothly with applications like Adobe Photoshop, making it accessible for both beginners and professionals. The tools in the Suite, like DDO and NDO, simplify the process of creating detail-rich textures and normals. With its PBR (Physically Based Rendering) workflow, Quixel Suite ensures that materials and textures look realistic and are compatible with modern rendering engines.

Recommended for

  • 3D artists
  • Game developers
  • Visual effects artists
  • Architectural visualizers
  • Anyone looking to create realistic textures and materials

Quixel Suite videos

+ Add

Quixel SUITE 2.0 Revealed

More videos:

  • Review - Should I learn Substance Painter or Quixel Mixer?
  • Review - QUIXEL MIXER 2020 - FULL REVIEW AND WALKTHROUGH!
  • Review - New Quixel Mixer 2021 First Impressions

Mudbox videos

+ Add

MUDBOX 2019-REVIEW. REACTION. RANT.

More videos:

  • Review - 2019-20 Asset Design Mudbox and Retopology
  • Review - Should I Learn ZBrush or Mudbox?
  • Review - mudbox vs zbrush vs 3dcoat

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Quixel Suite and Mudbox)

Quixel Suite

Mudbox

3D
48 48%
3D
52% 52
Architecture
100 100%
Architecture
0% 0
Digital Drawing And Painting
0 0%
Digital Drawing And Painting
100% 100
3D Modeling
44 44%
3D Modeling
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using Quixel Suite and Mudbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Quixel Suite and Mudbox

Quixel Suite Reviews

15 Best ZBrush Alternatives 2022
Quixel Mixer is a free online tool available to anyone with a computer and an internet connection. There are no hidden costs or subscription fees; you can use Quixel Mixer as much or little as you like.
Source: rigorousthemes.com

Mudbox Reviews

15 Best ZBrush Alternatives 2022
Mudbox has many of the same features as other sculpting programs, like ZBrush and Sculptris. However, Mudbox’s focus on digital painting gives it an edge over its competitors.
Source: rigorousthemes.com
68 Best Painting Apps and Softwares
Why Mudbox? – Mudbox is packed with features for incorporating 3D effects to drawings, like painting directly onto 3D models, texture baking, retopology tools, and a professional digital sculpting toolset.
Source: www.mavenart.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Quixel Suite seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Quixel Suite mentions (18)

  • Series of works (Interior scenes and bunch of 3d models) made in Blender(Cycles).
    - All works made by me in Blender(modelling, lighting, cloth simulations, sculpting, simple rigging etc) and rendered in Cycles, sometimes using third-party (purchased or copyleft) materials for secondary objectives (such as bottles on background etc) from 3dsky.com Poliigon.com quixel.com. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Modelling a bathroom, should every tile be a component?
    Give Quixel Mixer a go; pretty intuitive and can get great results. Source: about 2 years ago
  • been working on this slime mould latleyl. what do you guys think about that?
    Hey man its moss from aixterior.com but I think you can find nice grass on quixel.com for free too :). Source: over 2 years ago
  • How can I make this random realistic tree leafes?
    It could also be done with a PBR material with displacement. Quixel mixer is a great tool for that: https://quixel.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Unfortunately, why most of our youth is not visionary and creative?
    I mean Quixel came out of Pakistan. That's pretty big. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Mudbox mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Mudbox yet. Tracking of Mudbox recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Quixel Suite and Mudbox, you can also consider the following products

Substance Designer - Substance Designer is a node-based non-destructive application for material authoring.

Blender - Blender is the open source, cross platform suite of tools for 3D creation.

ZBrush - ZBrush is a digital sculpting and painting software solution.

Substance 3D Painter - Substance 3D Painter has the tools you need to texture your 3D assets, from advanced brushes to Smart Materials that automatically adapt to your model. Breathe life into your art.

Sculptris - Sculptris: Enter a world of digital art without barriers.

Material Maker - Cross-platform, procedural texture generation tool.

Loading...