Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Quix VS emqtt

Compare Quix VS emqtt and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Quix logo Quix

Pure Python. No wrappers. No JVM. No cross-language debugging. Use the whole Python ecosystem to develop stream processing pipelines in fewer lines of code.

emqtt logo emqtt

emqtt - erlang mqtt broker
  • Quix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-05-01

Quix Streams is a cloud native library for processing data in Kafka using pure Python. It’s designed to give you the power of a distributed system in a lightweight library by combining the low-level scalability and resiliency features of Kafka with an easy to use Python interface (to ease newcomers to stream processing).

  • emqtt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

Quix features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

emqtt features and specs

  • High Performance
    eMQTT is designed for high performance and can handle millions of connections concurrently. It's optimized for both latency and throughput, making it ideal for large-scale IoT applications.
  • Scalability
    eMQTT can scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. This makes it easy to adjust the system according to the growing number of devices and data throughput requirements.
  • Extensibility
    eMQTT supports various plugins and extensions that can be used to add additional functionalities or integrate with other systems.
  • Rich Feature Set
    It offers features like TLS/SSL encryption, authentication, authorization, message logging, and various MQTT protocol extensions, providing a comprehensive solution for messaging needs.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, eMQTT allows for greater transparency, customizability, and community support. Developers can adapt the code to better fit their specific requirements.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple operating systems including Linux, Mac OS, and Windows, thus offering flexibility in diverse deployment environments.
  • Multiple Protocols
    In addition to MQTT, eMQTT supports other protocols such as MQTT-SN, CoAP, and WebSocket, making it versatile for various IoT scenarios.
  • Good Documentation
    eMQTT comes with extensive documentation that helps developers understand its features and how to implement them effectively.

Possible disadvantages of emqtt

  • Complexity
    Due to its rich feature set and extensibility, eMQTT can be complex to configure and manage, especially for users who are new to MQTT brokers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Being designed for high performance and scalability, eMQTT can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial CPU and memory, which might not be suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Learning Curve
    The myriad features and configurations can present a steep learning curve for new users or those not familiar with MQTT or distributed systems.
  • Community and Support
    While it has a growing community, it might not have as extensive support or as large a user base as some other established MQTT brokers, potentially resulting in slower resolutions for community-driven support.
  • Licensing Costs
    While eMQTT is open-source, some advanced features and extended support might require a commercial license, which could be a drawback for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • Maintenance
    Managing and maintaining a scalable eMQTT cluster might require specialized skills and ongoing effort, which can increase the overall operational costs.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Quix and emqtt)
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
IoT Connectivity
0 0%
100% 100
Data Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Quix and emqtt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, emqtt seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Quix mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Quix yet. Tracking of Quix recommendations started around May 2024.

emqtt mentions (6)

  • Measuring Crowd Engagement with an MQTT-based IoT App
    Before applying our application to the cluster, we need to make sure there is a MQTT broker running that can be reached from within the cluster. For simplicity, we are deploying an EMQX MQTT broker as a Pod in the cluster along with a service we can configure as the address for the MQTT trigger in our Spin application. For testing purposes, we will also apply a fake sound sensor to the cluster that publishes sound... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Simplest Guide to DIY Your Own LLM Toy in 2024
    EMQX (optional): Open-source MQTT broker for IoT, IIoT, and connected vehicles. Used for managing your toys. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • All right, which one of you did this?
    I do know a real world use for Erlang (it also surprised me when I investigated about it), but two of the biggest mqtt brokers are coded in erlang: emqx, vernemq. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Comparing MQTT Brokers for the Industrial IoT
    EMQX is a 10-year-old open-source project under Apache License 2.0, with 11k stars on GitHub(https://github.com/emqx/emqx), 20M downloads on DockerHub (https://hub.docker.com/r/emqx/emqx), and 400+ paid customers worldwide. The Sweden address you mentioned is only the registered address of our Sweden entity. We’re a globally distributed team. EMQX European R&D team members work remotely in Sweden, Germany, the UK,... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Reaching 100M MQTT Connections with EMQX 5.0
    EMQX is an open-source, highly scalable, and distributed MQTT messaging broker written in Erlang/OTP that can support millions of concurrent clients. As such, there is a need to persist and replicate various data among the cluster nodes. For example: MQTT topics and their subscribers, routing information, ACL rules, various configurations, and many more. Since its beginning, EMQX has used Mnesia as the database... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Quix and emqtt, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

EMQX - EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.

MQTTBox - MQTTBox enables to create MQTT clients to publish or subscript topics, create MQTT virtual device...