Software Alternatives & Reviews

qmake VS Autoconf

Compare qmake VS Autoconf and see what are their differences

qmake logo qmake

Qt 5 qmake Makefile generator tool

Autoconf logo Autoconf

GNU Autoconf is a tool for producing configure scripts for building, installing and packaging...
  • qmake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Autoconf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

qmake

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • JS Build Tools
  • Continuous Integration
Website packages.debian.org

Autoconf

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • Continuous Integration
  • JS Build Tools
Website gnu.org

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to qmake and Autoconf)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
41 41%
59% 59
Continuous Integration
64 64%
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using qmake and Autoconf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing qmake and Autoconf, you can also consider the following products

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Automake - GNU Automake is a programming tool that produces portable makefiles for use by the make program...