Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

QF-Test VS Capybara

Compare QF-Test VS Capybara and see what are their differences

QF-Test logo QF-Test

The Tool for professional UI Test Automation - Automate your Web, Java, Windows and Android tests with QF-Test, the professional & reliable testing tool!

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.
  • QF-Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17

QF-Test is the established tool for professional GUI test automation of desktop, web, mobile applications as well as PDF documents. On the market since 2001, the test tool is continuously being actively developed and is currently used by more than 1,500 companies across 60 countries.

QF-Test is a low-code GUI test tool that allows you to efficiently create test cases, e.g. using Capture/Replay, without any programming knowledge across platforms on Windows, Linux and macOS. For software developers, Jython, Groovy or JavaScript offer advanced scripting possibilities.

Tests can be run automatically via continuous integration tools such as Jenkins and generate detailed log files and XML or HTML reports.

Use QF-Test to create robust and stable regression tests for various GUI technologies.

QF-Test supports all types of Java GUIs, ranging from Swing (including ULC, JIDE components, CaptainCasa), its successor JavaFX, as well as the Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) and Eclipse, including plugins and RCP applications.

You can also use QF-Test to test dynamic web applications based on Angular, React or Vue.js, for example, including Electron and hybrid applications using JxBrowser, JPro or WebSwing, for example.

Learn more at www.qfs.de. Contact us at service@qfs.de and we will help you find the right place for QF-Test in your organization!

  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05

QF-Test

Website
qfs.de
$ Details
paid Free Trial €2375.0 / One-off (One-time License purchase | Annual Maintenance + Support fee)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Java Jython Groovy JavaScript Cross Platform Browser Google Chrome Safari Internet Explorer Firefox Edge Opera .Net C++ C
Release Date
2001 December

Capybara

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

QF-Test features and specs

  • Continuous Integration: e.g. Jenkins, GitLab/CD, Bamboo, Travis CI, Circle CI, TeamCity, Ant, Maven, CruiseControl
  • Testing management: e.g. ALM/QualityCenter by MicroFocus/HP, TestBench by Imbus, QMetry, Klaros by Verit, TestLink, IBM Rational Quality Manager
  • Keyword driven Testing: Yes
  • Data driven Testing: e.g. with Excel, CSV and all kind of data bases
  • Error tracking: e.g. Jira, Mantis, Bugzilla
  • Scripting Language: Jython, Groovy, JavaScript
  • Browser: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Safari, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer
  • Jira Integration: e.g. JIRA and JIRA PlugIns like TestRail, Zephyr, X-Ray, TM4J
  • Java in the browser: Webswing, JPro
  • Daemon mode: Yes
  • Object Recognition: Yes, stable and robust
  • Virtual Desktop Streaming: e.g. Citrix, VMware, VirtualBox
  • Docker: Yes
  • Version Control: e.g. Git, SVN/Subversion, CVS, Mercurial

Capybara features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

QF-Test videos

Overview

More videos:

  • Demo - Quick Run-Through - Test Automation Features
  • Demo - Version 5.3 - CDP-Driver and New Icons
  • Demo - Technical insights
  • Review - Selenium vs. QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Review - Testing PDF Documents with QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.0 - Testing Windows applications
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.1 - embedded browsers

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QF-Test and Capybara)
Automated Testing
34 34%
66% 66
Browser Testing
48 48%
52% 52
Testing
19 19%
81% 81
Website Testing
65 65%
35% 35

User comments

Share your experience with using QF-Test and Capybara. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Capybara seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QF-Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QF-Test yet. Tracking of QF-Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Capybara mentions (12)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QF-Test and Capybara, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Ranorex Studio - Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.