Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

QEMU Manager VS Basilisk II

Compare QEMU Manager VS Basilisk II and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

QEMU Manager logo QEMU Manager

It is a GUI for the open-source virtualization software QEMU.

Basilisk II logo Basilisk II

Basilisk II is an Open Source 68k Macintosh emulator.
  • QEMU Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-19
  • Basilisk II Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-23

QEMU Manager features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    QEMU Manager provides a graphical user interface that simplifies the management of QEMU virtual machines, making it accessible for users who are not comfortable with command-line tools.
  • Integrated VM Management
    The software allows users to easily create, configure, and manage virtual machines, offering a range of options for customizing VM settings through an integrated platform.
  • Support for Multiple Platforms
    QEMU Manager offers compatibility with various operating systems, making it a versatile tool for running different types of environments within virtual machines.
  • Free to Use
    As a free application, QEMU Manager can be a cost-effective solution for users seeking virtualization tools without incurring licensing fees.

Possible disadvantages of QEMU Manager

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other virtualization software, QEMU Manager may lack advanced features and extended functionality required by professional users for complex tasks.
  • Performance Overhead
    Users might experience performance overhead when running virtual machines, as is common with virtualization solutions, which may impact the efficiency of resource-intensive applications.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being a frontend for QEMU, the manager might inherit stability issues, bugs, or updates that could affect the performance and reliability of the virtual machines.
  • Dependency on QEMU
    QEMU Manager relies on the QEMU emulator, meaning that any limitations or updates to QEMU itself directly impact the functionality and performance of the manager.

Basilisk II features and specs

  • Open Source
    Basilisk II is an open-source emulator, allowing developers and users to contribute to its improvement and customization without any licensing costs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    It supports various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering users flexibility in choosing their preferred OS for running the emulator.
  • Classic Mac OS Experience
    Basilisk II provides the opportunity to run legacy applications and games from the era of Apple's 68k Macintosh computers, preserving software that may otherwise be inaccessible.
  • Active Community
    There is an active community of users and developers who contribute to forums and documentation, helping new users get started and troubleshoot issues.

Possible disadvantages of Basilisk II

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup can be challenging for new users, as it requires obtaining a legally compatible Mac ROM image and configuring system settings properly.
  • Performance Limitations
    While capable of running many old applications, Basilisk II does not perfectly replicate the performance of original hardware, which can result in bugs or slowdowns.
  • Limited Hardware Emulation
    It focuses mainly on software emulation and lacks support for certain hardware peripherals, which can limit use scenarios for specific applications.
  • Legal Issues
    Using Basilisk II legally requires access to a Macintosh ROM and OS, which can be a legal gray area if users do not own an original Macintosh machine.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QEMU Manager and Basilisk II)
Virtual Machine Management
Group Chat & Notifications
Cloud Computing
68 68%
32% 32
Gaming
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using QEMU Manager and Basilisk II. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Basilisk II seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QEMU Manager mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QEMU Manager yet. Tracking of QEMU Manager recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Basilisk II mentions (9)

  • Software Applications Incorporated
    Https://infinitemac.org, which is https://basilisk.cebix.net compiled for the web using https://emscripten.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How to Get and Run Rolypolys 2
    Basilisk II, at least for me, had issues when it came to loading game saves. It also had an issue where sound cut out entirely about an hour into the game, so I cannot personally recommend it for this particular game. I was recommended SheepShaver as an alternative. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • [Mac/PC] [90s?] Top down 2D action/arcade game
    ShadowWraith would have run best on a Mac with a 68040 processor, at least 10 MB RAM, running System 7.1, 7.5, or 7.6.1. You could try setting up Basilisk II to run it. MAME’s Mac emulation has also come along quite a bit in the last few years, although it can still be a bit rough around the edges. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Anyone have access to Apple’s serial number database? Case refers to a PowerMac10,1 with 1,42GHz G4 but actually boots into a PowerMac10,2 with 1,5GHz G4. SN is YM54904UTAA. Might just be the cleanest and prettiest lunch box Mac I have ever laid my hands on after a restoration job.
    I have a Mac mini (Early 2006) (Intel Core Solo) that I upgraded to a 1.83 GHz Core 2 Duo, on which I run the Basilisk II 68k emulator (informative support forums are here). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Any way to open windows 69 word files
    That's actually really good news and explains why they don't have a file extension! It might still take some work, but you could very likely find the exact version of Word that he used to create the files on macintoshgarden.org and could then use something like Basilisk II to run it and open the files. Hopefully from there it's just a simple Save As to something a modern computer can understand. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QEMU Manager and Basilisk II, you can also consider the following products

bochs - Bochs IA-32 Emulator provides a virtual PC that can run operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and BSD.

Sheepshaver - Home page of the SheepShaver Macintosh emulator

QEMU - QEMU (short for "Quick EMUlator") is a free and open-source hosted hypervisor that...

Mini vMac - The Mini vMac emulator collection allows modern computers to run software made for early Macintosh...

VMware Workstation - VMware Workstation is a multiple operating system handler to easily evaluate the any other type of new operating systems.

Shoebill - Shoebill - a Macintosh II emulator that runs A/UX (and A/UX only).