QApt VS bauh

Compare QApt VS bauh and see what are their differences

ASocks

Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

QApt

QApt is a collection of tools and a library providing a wrapper around APT. The intention is to ease the use of APT in Qt-based programs

bauh (ba-oo), formerly known as fpakman, is a graphical interface for managing your Linux software (packages/applications). It currently supports the following formats: AppImage, ArchLinux repositories/AUR, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications.

Landing page //
2023-01-18

Landing page //
2023-10-07

QApt

Website: tracker.debian.org

Edit details

bauh

Website: github.com

Edit details

QApt features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

bauh features and specs

Universal Package Management
Bauh provides a unified interface for managing various types of packages and applications, including native system packages and third-party formats like AppImage, Flatpak, Snap, and NPM.
User-Friendly Interface
It offers a graphical user interface that simplifies the management of software, making it accessible to users who may not be comfortable using command-line tools.
Extensive App Support
Bauh supports a wide range of applications and package formats, increasing flexibility and availability of software for users.
Multilingual Support
The application provides support for multiple languages, making it more accessible to a global user base.
Cross-Platform
Bauh is designed to work on various Linux distributions, enhancing its adaptability across different operating environments.

Possible disadvantages of bauh

Limited to Linux
Bauh is primarily designed for the Linux operating system, so users of other operating systems cannot take advantage of its features.
Dependency on External Libraries
Bauh may require additional packages and dependencies that need to be installed separately, which can complicate setup for some users.
Resource Consumption
Running a graphical application for package management could consume more system resources compared to command-line alternatives, potentially impacting performance on low-spec systems.
Lack of In-depth Documentation
Some users may find the documentation for Bauh to be less comprehensive, which can make troubleshooting and advanced usage more challenging.

QApt videos

No QApt videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

bauh videos

+ Add

Review Bauh semangka 🍉 || Kebun Buah Segar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QApt and bauh)

QApt

bauh

Software Marketplace

40 40%

Software Marketplace

60% 60

Front End Package Manager

45 45%

Front End Package Manager

55% 55

Windows Tools

65 65%

Windows Tools

35% 35

Work Music

0 0%

Work Music

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using QApt and bauh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bauh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QApt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QApt yet. Tracking of QApt recommendations started around Jan 2023.

bauh mentions (12)

Imade a simple shell script program to manage packages in Linux. Currently it supports apt, flatpak, snap. It can probably be useful for someone.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: almost 2 years ago
Problems installing many apps
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 2 years ago
Name a program that doesn't get enough love!
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 2 years ago
BalenaEtcher appimage is not clickable?
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 2 years ago
Boutique: a Flatpak app store (alpha) feedbacks are welcome
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 3 years ago