Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

QA Tech VS Cypress.io

Compare QA Tech VS Cypress.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

QA Tech logo QA Tech

Improve your software quality with AI-driven QA testing. Find out how to ensure bug-free apps, with instant feedback and better productivity.

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
  • QA Tech QA.tech website
    QA.tech website //
    2024-11-14
  • QA Tech Add Custom Tests
    Add Custom Tests //
    2024-11-14
  • QA Tech AI Agent Scans and Learns
    AI Agent Scans and Learns //
    2024-11-14
  • QA Tech Edit Tests
    Edit Tests //
    2024-11-14

QA.tech is an AI-powered tool for QA testing, empowering engineers to be more productive by autonomous testing of applications. No more waiting for feedback from your QA team or stakeholders. Get instant feedback on your work, with less bugs, improved quality and faster time-to-market.

  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17

QA Tech

Website
qa.tech
$ Details
freemium $99.0 / Monthly ($99 /month per team)
Startup details
Country
Sweden
Founder(s)
Daniel Mauno Pettersson, Patrick Lef, Vilhelm von Ehrenheim

QA Tech features and specs

  • Automatic Test Detection
    The AI scans your web app, and generates tests based on user interactions and objectives.
  • Create Custom Tests
    Start with a simple prompt, and the AI will generate custom tests. Giving you a real working E2E test in just a few seconds.
  • Bug Reports
    Receive detailed bug reports with console logs, network requests, and more. Replay tests and export issues to tools like Linear, Jira, or Clickup.

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

QA Tech videos

No QA Tech videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QA Tech and Cypress.io)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
26 26%
74% 74
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing QA Tech and Cypress.io.

What makes your product unique?

QA Tech's answer

QA.tech leverages AI to blend the expertise of QA engineers with the efficiency of automated testing, streamlining time-to-market, reducing expenses, and enhancing user satisfaction. By simulating human testing at automated speeds, we offer a comprehensive repository of best practices and usage patterns. Our services encompass identifying release-blocking issues and recommending code fixes and improvements of identified issues.

What's the story behind your product?

QA Tech's answer

QA.tech emerged from the recognition that traditional QA testing, while essential, is often perceived as time-consuming and monotonous. Developers prefer focusing on product development rather than writing and maintaining tests. To address this challenge, QA.tech was founded with the mission of automating QA testing using AI technology, freeing up developers' time and reducing errors. Backed by a $1 million pre-seed funding round, QA.tech aims to revolutionize software testing by combining the efficiency of end-to-end tests with the precision of manual testing. The founding team, comprising entrepreneurs and engineers with vast experience in technology and entrepreneurship, is dedicated to making QA testing more efficient and accessible for businesses across the globe.

How would you describe your primary audience?

QA Tech's answer

The primary audience for QA.tech includes software developers, CTOs, QA engineers at companies which provide a website application and are looking to streamline their quality assurance processes. These professionals are seeking efficient and effective solutions to automate testing, reduce errors, and accelerate time-to-market for their software products. Additionally, QA.tech may also appeal to product managers and other stakeholders responsible for overseeing software development projects and ensuring product quality.

User comments

Share your experience with using QA Tech and Cypress.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare QA Tech and Cypress.io

QA Tech Reviews

We have no reviews of QA Tech yet.
Be the first one to post

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QA Tech mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QA Tech yet. Tracking of QA Tech recommendations started around Feb 2024.

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QA Tech and Cypress.io, you can also consider the following products

Webo.AI - Welcome to the world of Infinite AI testing

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

QA Wolf - QA Wolf gets web apps to 80% automated end-to-end test coverage in weeks, not years. With unlimited, parallel runs and our Zero Flake Guarantee.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

Owlity.ai - The first and only AI QA solution to replace your QA department. Our autonomous testing software eliminates the need for human involvement.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...