Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PURISTA VS NATS

Compare PURISTA VS NATS and see what are their differences

PURISTA logo PURISTA

Typescript framework for IoT, microservices, and serverless

NATS logo NATS

NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.
  • PURISTA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30
  • NATS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05

NATS.io is a connective technology for distributed systems and is a perfect fit to connect devices, edge, cloud or hybrid deployments. True multi-tenancy makes NATS ideal for SaaS and self-healing and scaling technology allows for topology changes anytime with zero downtime.

PURISTA videos

No PURISTA videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

NATS videos

The coolest OSS project you've never heard of: NATS Getting started!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PURISTA and NATS)
Developer Tools
6 6%
94% 94
Key-Value Database
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PURISTA and NATS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PURISTA and NATS

PURISTA Reviews

We have no reviews of PURISTA yet.
Be the first one to post

NATS Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
NATS is designed to be simple and easy to use, with a small footprint and low latency. It is often used in cloud-native environments to connect different components of a distributed system or to enable communication between microservices. NATS also supports message persistence, security, and clustering, making it a robust messaging system for building scalable and resilient...
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
One challenge of NATS is that it does not support reliable message queuing out of the box - messages can be lost if a client disconnects before it receives them. This can be mitigated by using NATS Streaming, a data streaming system powered by NATS, but it adds complexity.
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NATS is known for its high performance, low latency, and emphasis on simplicity after it was rewritten in Go. Its rewrite in Go makes NATS an ideal choice for demanding and real-time applications and has increased its throughput compared to its original Ruby implementation.
Source: gcore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NATS seems to be a lot more popular than PURISTA. While we know about 65 links to NATS, we've tracked only 2 mentions of PURISTA. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PURISTA mentions (2)

  • Do we need a new player in TypeScript event sourcing?
    If you like, you can have a look at my stuff at https://purista.dev or ping me. Would be nice to have some conversation about this event sourcing topic. Source: about 1 year ago
  • The power of PURISTA TypeScript Framework v1.7
    Visit the official PURISTA website purista.dev to learn more about PURISTA v1.7 and embark on a new era of application development. Unleash your creativity, enhance collaboration, and deliver exceptional software solutions with PURISTA TypeScript Framework v1.7. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

NATS mentions (65)

  • HN-text: an easy-to-use, text-first Hacker News terminal client
    That sounds awesome. I have actually been working on something similar myself. I have been building a distributed NATS[0] cluster to funnel data down from the internet and index it locally. I also have a local Ollama box wired up to try to do some NLP on it. I started with Benthos to pull in, but since the recent license changes[1] I am rethinking that :( If you would like to collaborate feel free to shoot me an... - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago
  • Hello World, Simple Event Broker
    I've been happy with NATS, https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 21 days ago
  • Implementing OTel Trace Context Propagation Through Message Brokers with Go
    Several message brokers, such as NATS and database queues, are not supported by OpenTelemetry (OTel) SDKs. This article will guide you on how to use context propagation explicitly with these message queues. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • NATS: First Impressions
    Https://nats.io/ (Tracker removed) > Connective Technology for Adaptive Edge & Distributed Systems > An Introduction to NATS - The first screencast I guess I don't need to know what it is. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Sequential and parallel execution of long-running shell commands
    Pueue dumps the state of the queue to the disk as JSON every time the state changes, so when you have a lot of queued jobs this results in considerable disk io. I actually changed it to compress the state file via zstd which helped quite a bit but then eventually just moved on to running NATS [1] locally. [1] https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PURISTA and NATS, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

Infisical - Infisical is an open source, end-to-end encrypted platform that lets you securely sync secrets and configs across your engineering team and infrastructure

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.