Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PureScript VS LambdaTest

Compare PureScript VS LambdaTest and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PureScript logo PureScript

PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript.

LambdaTest logo LambdaTest

Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS
  • PureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-19

We recommend LibHunt PureScript for discovery and comparisons of trending PureScript projects.

  • LambdaTest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-09

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace. The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms. Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing* Additionally, LambdaTest also offers complimentary access of LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions. You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

PureScript

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

LambdaTest

$ Details
freemium $15.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser Windows Android Web iOS Google Chrome Mac OSX Firefox Safari
Release Date
2017 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
California
Founder(s)
Asad Khan
Employees
100 - 249

PureScript features and specs

  • Strong Typing
    PureScript features a robust type system with advanced type inference, which can help catch errors at compile-time and increase code reliability.
  • Immutability
    PureScript promotes immutability by default, leading to more predictable and maintainable code, especially beneficial in concurrent applications.
  • JavaScript Interoperability
    PureScript can interoperate seamlessly with JavaScript, allowing developers to leverage existing JavaScript libraries and tools within PureScript projects.
  • Functional Programming
    PureScript is a purely functional language, offering all the advantages of functional programming such as higher-order functions, and a strong emphasis on functions as first-class citizens.
  • Safety and Predictability
    The language ensures safer and more predictable code by eliminating certain classes of runtime errors through compile-time checks.

Possible disadvantages of PureScript

  • Smaller Community
    Compared to more mainstream languages, PureScript has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources and libraries available.
  • Learning Curve
    PureScript's focus on functional programming and its type system can present a steep learning curve for developers unfamiliar with these concepts.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    The tooling and ecosystem around PureScript may not be as mature or extensive as those of more established languages, which can impact productivity.
  • Performance Overheads
    Due to its focus on immutability and the abstraction over JavaScript, some use-cases might face performance overheads compared to plain JavaScript.
  • Complexity in Interop
    Despite its capability to interoperate with JavaScript, managing the integration between PureScript and JavaScript can sometimes be complex and error-prone.

LambdaTest features and specs

  • Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing
  • Selenium Web Testing Automation
  • Parallel Testing For Goto Market Launch
  • API for Continuous Testing
  • Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing
  • Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools
  • LT Browser App for Responsive Testing
  • Faster Automated Screenshot Testing

PureScript videos

Claudia Doppioslash | Building a Graphical IDE in Elm/Purescript

More videos:

  • Review - Haskell Livecoding - Working on PureScript's IDE (3)
  • Review - PureScript Meetup #13 Type Classes

LambdaTest videos

Cross Browser Testing Using LambdaTest | LambdaTest Tutorial | Selenium Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Tutorial - LambdaTest Cross Browser Testing Tool Tutorial
  • Review - LambdaTest vs BrowserStack - Browser Compatibility Testing Tools Reviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PureScript and LambdaTest)
Personal Finance
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Financial Planner
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PureScript and LambdaTest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PureScript and LambdaTest

PureScript Reviews

We have no reviews of PureScript yet.
Be the first one to post

LambdaTest Reviews

  1. Alina-Novikava
    · Software QA Engineer at uTest ·
    LambdaTest an essential tool for cross browser compatibility

    Initially we were skeptical whether a cloud infrastructure would be able to give us the flexibility, speed and browser coverage we need for our agile sprints. But LambdaTest has been a complete value for money to us.

    They usually get the latest browsers on-board under 2 weeks time and are never compromising the experience over legacy browsers at the same time. The machines are quick to load and we rely heavily over the Monday integration, it helps us share screenshots instantly among ourselves without having to be stuck in long email chains.

    We have been using LambdaTest for around 8 months and it has been so far so good.

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Underpass app, very helpful for local testing on development environment|Stability is good, downtimes are notified if any|Up to date with latest browsers and os like safari 14, macos big sur|Integrations with monday, jira, and more prominent tools
    👎 Cons:    Need more devices for screenshot testing|Would love to see mobile application testing
  2. Lee Jelley
    · DevOps & Cloud Engineer at Contino ·
    LambdaTest Our Go-To Platform For Selenium Testing

    LambdaTest has made our testing process less tedious with automated parallel testing. Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple hours. Parallel testing has helped us with faster feedback loops to scale up our go to market efforts.

    Having a global user base we have active traffic from varied locations and testing on multiple platforms and browsers is a continuous process for the team. The feature that stands out for us is geolocation testing, all you need to do is run the capabilities and test the website for the desired location. We use Azure Pipelines for CI/CD and LambdaTest extension for Azure has helped us get a seamless testing experience for our privately hosted projects. Thanks to that we are now able to easily ensure browser compatibility for all the changes before we move them to Prod. Kudos to the team!

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Support team is very active|Extensions to perform testing with ci/cd tools like azure pipelines|Always up to date with latest browsers|Offers 70+ integrations, glad to see it integrates with jira|Affordable pricing option
    👎 Cons:    Cypress integration is missing|Native app testing is not available yet
  3. Rod Morales
    · Front End Developer at SavvyCard ·
    Easy, Useful and provides lots of data for debugging

    Have been using Lambdatest for around 6 months now, and could say that it’s a useful testing tool for our team. Offering great combinations of browsers and operating systems for you to test on and most importantly there are many types of additional logs that come with each test which helps in debugging.. Glad to see the integration with Travis CI due to which we could optimally use this tool with our CI CD pipelines directly. We were able to effectively run TestNG and Selenium tests using their documentation and as an added advantage their support team is quick and helpful

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Detailed documentation, helps you with quick implementation|Apis for extracting test run data like logs and run video|Good community to help to dig deep for possible outcomes.|Screenshot testing feature|Integration with jira
    👎 Cons:    There is a latency in a single test when compared to a local machine. maybe because of the cloud? so you have to run in parallel to cut down on testing times.

Top Selenium Alternatives
Lambdatest is a comprehensive browser automation tool that provides a cloud-based platform for automated and manual cross-browser testing. With support for a plethora of browser and OS combinations, it ensures that web applications perform consistently in various environments. Lambdatest integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, supports visual regression testing, and offers...
Source: bugbug.io
16 Best Android Emulators For PCs In 2023
LambdaTest comes with Native App Testing features that let you conduct online live interactive native mobile app testing anywhere in the world by simply uploading your .apk file. Perform cross browser testing and run your automation tests at scale.
Source: theqalead.com
Best Automation Testing Tools (Free and Paid) | July 2022
It allows us to test on the latest mobile and desktop browsers on the cloud. We can ensure our website is compatible across all browsers and devices by performing Real-time cross Browser Compatibility testing with LambdaTest.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LambdaTest should be more popular than PureScript. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PureScript mentions (2)

  • Building Mystery Mansion Madness without a UI Framework
    Before 2012, all of my websites were made using HTML, CSS and a sprinkling of JS. Then, I went all-in on AngularJS, followed by React. I started using Typescript and then PureScript and learned more frameworks like Halogen and Concur. I even wrote my own UI framework called purescript-deku. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Incrementally Adopting PureScript in a JavaScript Web Application
    I hope you get a chance to try PureScript out in your JS projects! For more learning resources, you can check out PureScript website. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

LambdaTest mentions (10)

  • Testing Transformed: QA’s New Role in Digital Transformation
    AI-Powered Testing: You’ve heard enough about this on LinkedIn & elsewhere on the internet. We’ve seen enough proof that it is unlikely to be a passing cloud. I don’t have specific advice on where you can use these ML, NLP, and LLM technologies, but I already see a lot of testers beginning to use it for test case development, coding & writing emails. Tools like LambdaTest are already leveraging AI to enhance test... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Agile Traceability: Connecting the Dots Without Slowing Down – Part 2
    Tools like LambdaTest offer automated traceability features designed to keep your workflows smooth and your team aligned with what matters most. As your projects evolve, LambdaTest scales with you, providing a simple yet effective way to connect the dots, and helping your team stay focused on delivering great results without the extra hassle. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Pyppeteer Tutorial: The Ultimate Guide to Using Puppeteer with Python
    Import asyncio Import pytest From pyppeteer.errors import PageError From urllib.parse import quote Import os Import sys From os import environ From pyppeteer import connect, launch Exec_platform = os.getenv('EXEC_PLATFORM') Test_url = 'https://lambdatest.com/' # Selectors of the page # Pytest fixture for browser setup @pytest.fixture(scope='function') Async def browser(): if exec_platform == 'local': ... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Simplify Your Debugging Process With Enhanced LT Debug 2.0
    If you want to perform cross-domain Ajax requests faster, adding the (Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *) rule to your response header will allow you to do so. For example, you can bypass CORS on lambdatest.com when you turn it on while accessing the resources. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Testing Modern Applications With Playwright 🎭
    Const { webkit, chromium } = require('playwright'); (async () => { const browser = await chromium.launch(); const page = await browser.newPage(); // Listen for all console logs page.on('console', msg => console.log(msg.text())) // Listen for all console events and handle errors page.on('console', msg => { if (msg.type() === 'error') ... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PureScript and LambdaTest, you can also consider the following products

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.