Purecss VS Inferno

Purecss

A set of small, responsive CSS modules that you can use in every web project.

Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.

Landing page //
2022-04-18

Landing page //
2023-05-11

CSS Flexbox layout with inline-block fallback using PureCSS grids

Inferno videos

+ Add

Inferno - Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Purecss and Inferno)

Inferno

CSS Framework

100 100%

CSS Framework

0% 0

Javascript UI Libraries

0 0%

Javascript UI Libraries

100% 100

Development Tools

100 100%

Development Tools

0% 0

JavaScript Framework

0 0%

JavaScript Framework

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Purecss and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Purecss and Inferno

Purecss Reviews

Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022

At only 3.7 KB minified, Pure is the most compact CSS Framework around. Out of all the CSS frameworks, Pure will help you create awesome CSS Code without sacrificing space. You can add pure-min.css through free unpkg CDN in your code to use Pure. You can also install Pure using a package manager like npm, Grunt, etc.

Source: hackr.io

15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives

We consider Pure a minimalist alternative to Bootstrap that offers every module a beginner needs (navigation menu, grid, tables, etc.).

Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com

10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives

Pure is a lightweight CSS framework that’s designed specifically for mobile. It uses Normalize.css and offers design and styling to local HTML components in addition to the most well-known user interface components. Minimalism is based on Pure, which is incredibly little; a complete set of modules weighs in at 3.7KB* minified and gzipped, making it one of the tiniest...

Source: thetechhacker.com

Top 5 Bootstrap Alternatives

All the modules when bundled together and gzipped are 3.7 KB, although individually they amount to more. The grid module is just 0.8 KB, while the Base module is 1.0 KB. The team behind PureCSS says that it was built entirely with mobile devices in mind, and so every line of CSS was carefully scrutinized for efficiency before being included.

Source: geekflare.com

Bootstrap Alternatives 2019: Advanced CSS Frameworks for Developers

Pure is a clustered set of CSS modules, which might not sound convincing but it does well what is it designed for. The platform defines itself as a set of small responsive CSS modules which can be used in every project. Pure is incredibly tiny for a framework. Its entire set is sized at 3.8 KB. The platform is primarily designed with mobile devices in mind, which is why the...

Source: www.technadu.com

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using

There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:

Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Purecss should be more popular than Inferno. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Purecss mentions (8)

CSS framework for Dioxus + mobile
I found Pure.css and it looks nice but maybe there is something better? Source: 12 months ago
Is a website built completely on HTML, CSS and JS enough?
Some examples: - https://simplecss.org/ - https://purecss.io/ (I've used this one for over a decade and works great). Source: over 1 year ago
CSP nonce with Node.js and EJS
Now, to test our CSP, we just have to load some external resources. Let's bring on Pure.css and Lodash. Update index.ejs to look like this :. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Bootstrap vs Tailwind
Personally I don't like either. Bootstrap seems too bloated and cookie-cutter, and Tailwind is inline styles and clutter. Lately I've used Bulma (CSS framework) and Buefy (Bulma + Vue) on a couple of projects. I also like the look of Pure CSS, but I haven't used it. Source: about 2 years ago
Just wondering...anyone else here use HTML, CSS, and Vanilla JS exclusively?
I use https://purecss.io/ all the time. Source: over 2 years ago

Inferno mentions (2)

Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago