Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PureBasic VS Tiny C Compiler

Compare PureBasic VS Tiny C Compiler and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

PureBasic logo PureBasic

Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

Tiny C Compiler logo Tiny C Compiler

The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.
  • PureBasic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21
  • Tiny C Compiler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-06

PureBasic features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    PureBasic supports Windows, Linux, and Mac OS, allowing developers to write code once and run it on multiple operating systems without modifications.
  • Simple Syntax
    The language has a straightforward and easy-to-learn syntax, making it accessible for beginners and enabling rapid development.
  • Fast Executables
    PureBasic compiles directly to native machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal dependencies.
  • Comprehensive Standard Library
    The language provides a wide range of built-in libraries that simplify tasks like GUI creation, networking, and multimedia management.
  • Active Community
    PureBasic has an active and supportive community, offering forums, tutorials, and third-party resources that can help developers solve problems and enhance their projects.

Possible disadvantages of PureBasic

  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    Compared to more popular languages, PureBasic has fewer third-party libraries and frameworks, which can limit functionality and integrations.
  • Niche Market
    PureBasic is not as widely used as other programming languages, which can result in fewer job opportunities and community resources.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    The language is designed to be simple, which means it may lack some advanced programming constructs and paradigms found in other languages.
  • License Cost
    PureBasic is not free software; there is a one-time cost associated with obtaining a license, which may be a consideration for developers or small businesses with budget constraints.
  • Basic IDE
    The integrated development environment that comes with PureBasic is quite basic compared to modern IDEs, potentially impacting coding efficiency.

Tiny C Compiler features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    Tiny C Compiler (TCC) is known for its incredibly fast compilation speed, which makes it ideal for quick compilations and testing.
  • Small Size
    TCC has a very small footprint compared to other compilers, making it easy to include in applications and use in environments with limited resources.
  • C99 Support
    TCC provides support for the C99 standard, allowing the use of newer C language features.
  • Dynamic Code Generation
    TCC can compile and execute code dynamically, which can be useful for scripting or embedded contexts.
  • Simplified Licensing
    Under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), TCC can be more easily used in various projects, including proprietary ones, compared to compilers with more restrictive licenses.

Possible disadvantages of Tiny C Compiler

  • Limited Optimization
    TCC does not perform extensive optimization, which can result in less efficient executable code compared to compilers like GCC or Clang.
  • Incomplete C Standard Library
    TCC's standard C library implementation is not as complete as those of more established compilers, which might lead to compatibility issues.
  • Lack of Detailed Documentation
    Users may find the available documentation lacking in detail, which can hinder learning and debugging for complex projects.
  • Limited Platform Support
    TCC is primarily designed for smaller-scale applications and lacks some platform-specific and cross-compilation capabilities.
  • Fewer Community Resources
    Compared to major compilers like GCC or Clang, TCC has a smaller user community, which can mean fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party support tools.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PureBasic and Tiny C Compiler)

PureBasic

Tiny C Compiler

IDE
54 54%
IDE
46% 46
Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Text Editors
63 63%
Text Editors
37% 37

User comments

Share your experience with using PureBasic and Tiny C Compiler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tiny C Compiler seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PureBasic mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PureBasic yet. Tracking of PureBasic recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Tiny C Compiler mentions (35)

  • Weird Lexical Syntax
    > I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Pnut: A C to POSIX Shell Compiler you can Trust
    "Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
    For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Exploring the Internals of Linux v0.01
    I was going to say, the list should include something by Fabrice Bellard. Tiny C Compiler is one. https://bellard.org/tcc/ I was thinking, maybe first version/commit of QEMU would be interesting to read. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • The C Interpreter: A Tutorial for Cin
    I occasionally use tcc (https://bellard.org/tcc/) like an interpreter (`tcc -run`), it's convenient for certain odd tasks. Not so much for interactive stuff, but if I'm building little PoCs for an idea that will get dropped into a C project, or fiddling with structs work out how something should/is being stored, or in situations where I'm making stuff that interacts with or examples based on C code and I want to... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PureBasic and Tiny C Compiler, you can also consider the following products

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

Portable C Compiler - pcc is a C99 compiler which aims to be small, simple, fast and understandable.

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

PowerBASIC - PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Loading...