PureBasic VS Monkey 2

• Cross-Platform Compatibility
  PureBasic supports Windows, Linux, and Mac OS, allowing developers to write code once and run it on multiple operating systems without modifications.
• Simple Syntax
  The language has a straightforward and easy-to-learn syntax, making it accessible for beginners and enabling rapid development.
• Fast Executables
  PureBasic compiles directly to native machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal dependencies.
• Comprehensive Standard Library
  The language provides a wide range of built-in libraries that simplify tasks like GUI creation, networking, and multimedia management.
• Active Community
  PureBasic has an active and supportive community, offering forums, tutorials, and third-party resources that can help developers solve problems and enhance their projects.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Third-Party Libraries
  Compared to more popular languages, PureBasic has fewer third-party libraries and frameworks, which can limit functionality and integrations.
• Niche Market
  PureBasic is not as widely used as other programming languages, which can result in fewer job opportunities and community resources.
• Lack of Advanced Features
  The language is designed to be simple, which means it may lack some advanced programming constructs and paradigms found in other languages.
• License Cost
  PureBasic is not free software; there is a one-time cost associated with obtaining a license, which may be a consideration for developers or small businesses with budget constraints.
• Basic IDE
  The integrated development environment that comes with PureBasic is quite basic compared to modern IDEs, potentially impacting coding efficiency.

• Cross-Platform Development
  Monkey 2 allows developers to write code once and deploy it across multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, streamlining the development process and saving time.
• Modern Language Features
  Monkey 2 supports modern programming language features such as type inference, generics, and lambda expressions, making it easier for developers to write clean and efficient code.
• Active Community
  The Monkey 2 community is active and engaged, providing support, resources, and shared knowledge, which can be very helpful for both new and experienced developers.
• Open Source
  Being open source, Monkey 2 allows developers to contribute to its improvement, ensuring that it can evolve according to the needs and desires of the community.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Documentation
  Monkey 2's documentation can be sparse or outdated in some areas, which might pose challenges for new developers trying to learn the language or troubleshoot issues.
• Smaller Ecosystem
  Compared to more popular programming languages, Monkey 2 has a smaller ecosystem, which might limit the availability of libraries, tools, and third-party support.
• Less Recognition
  Monkey 2 is not as widely recognized or adopted in the industry as some other programming languages, potentially impacting its perceived credibility and the availability of job opportunities.
• Development Pace
  While being open source is an advantage, the development pace of Monkey 2 might be slower than that of proprietary or more commercially supported languages, potentially delaying updates and new features.

Tracking PureBasic since Mar 2021.

• Wonkey: A cross-platform FOSS programming language by the creator of BlitzBasic

  On one hand, BlitzBasic and BlitzMax was a key moment for me, 15 years ago, of 'getting' programming - I clearly remember as a teenager when some basic concepts clicked together, and here I am many years later a full-time indie game... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago