Based on our record, PubMed.gov seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Scan. While we know about 563 links to PubMed.gov, we've tracked only 12 mentions of CSS Scan. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Yes, the actual results are definitely not as impressive as the overly hyped headlines, but there's still a lot. First off, in terms of research building up on top of it, as of today, Pubmed shows 9,364 articles citing their 2021 paper, and Google Scholar shows 21,719 results as a whole[1], but these include non-biomedical papers (e.g. Applications of similar ML models to other disciplines). As for actual... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
An unhealthy diet (i.e., nutrient deficient diet) harms adult brains. Unsurprising. To learn more, search for resources on pubmed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Curl -si04A "" "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=$x&sort=&page=${1-1}". - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Any thoughts on these folks (they are your direct competitor)? https://probiorahealth.com/product/probiora/ A decade or so ago, their founder started with genetically modified bacteria that supposedly outcompete wildtype strains. The regulators responded in the only sane way possible, and it didn't go to human trials, from what I can tell. List of publications from their founder:... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
This link is to PubMed, a search engine that indexes published science articles and studies. Although close to some author's names, I tried a quick search of Füm vaping but came up empty. Maybe you'll have better luck. I'd just ask one question. With zero tastebuds inside human lungs, what's the logic of inhaling nicotine-free vapor into your lungs? If going for taste, why not hold the vape in your mouth... Source: 6 months ago
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: about 1 year ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 1 year ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: over 1 year ago
🔺 A curated collection of 57 free shapes examples made with pure CSS: 👉 https://getcssscan.com/css-shapes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
Mendeley - Easily organize your papers, read & annotate your PDFs, collaborate in private or open groups, and securely access your research from everywhere.
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.