Public Library of Science VS Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health (NIH) \ PLOS (Public Library of Science - Open-source publishers) \ Google Scholar. Source: about 1 year ago

I have never actually taken the test, but as a former LSAT test writer, I can give some recommendations. If I were you, I would try to reach fluency with magazines like The Economist, The Atlantic (especially the science articles), and The New Yorker. Fluency means reading through the articles easily, without having to reread certain portions in order for the article to make sense. Once you're comfortable with... Source: almost 2 years ago

This has happened in biology - https://plos.org/. Source: almost 3 years ago

A few may know, that google scholar(https://scholar.google.com/) does not offer a feature for arranging the search results based on the number of citations. Several years ago, one developer published a Python code (https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar) to handle this. I had been inspired by his work, but I wanted to show the list of... - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago

To that point, https://scholar.google.com/ is still useful. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

1) find the doi number [1a][1b] 2) find sources that cite the doi number -> google scholar[2][3] 3) filter for 'github' ----- [1a]resolve a doi name : https://dx.doi.org/ [1b]find a doi number : https://answers.lib.iup.edu/faq/31945 [2] : https://scholar.google.com/ [3] : google with "site:http://doi.org/" [4] : finding a doi in document page :... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Half of those are about science, during my Ph.D., I was told to use scholar.google.com, which works great as far as I can tell. Couple it to sci-hub and you get all the scientific literature you need. Source: 5 months ago

Scholar.google.com exists also which is what you use for studies. Source: 5 months ago