Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Proxyman.io VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare Proxyman.io VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

Proxyman.io logo Proxyman.io

Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.
  • Proxyman.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-25

Modern and Delightful HTTP Debugging Proxy Proxyman is a native, high-performance macOS application, which enables developers to observe and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS requests.

  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Proxyman.io features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Proxyman.io provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, and Linux, ensuring a broad range of users can utilize the tool.
  • Real-time Traffic Interception
    Proxyman.io offers real-time traffic interception and inspection, enabling users to debug and analyze traffic as it happens.
  • HTTPS Decryption
    The tool supports HTTPS decryption, allowing users to view encrypted traffic for more thorough analysis.
  • Customizable Filters
    Users can set up customizable filters to focus on specific types of traffic or protocols, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Proxyman.io provides detailed documentation and tutorials, helping users to make the most of the software.
  • Active Community and Support
    The tool has an active community and responsive support team, providing assistance and updates regularly.

Possible disadvantages of Proxyman.io

  • Cost
    While Proxyman.io offers a free trial, the full version is paid, which might be a barrier for some users or smaller organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users might still experience a learning curve to fully utilize all features.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the system when intercepting high volumes of traffic.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version has limitations in terms of features and volume of traffic it can handle, which may necessitate purchasing the paid version for extensive use.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Like any software, it can have occasional bugs or performance issues, although these are generally addressed quickly by the development team.

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

Analysis of Proxyman.io

Overall verdict

  • Proxyman.io is generally considered a good tool for developers in need of a robust and intuitive proxy tool. It provides essential features for network traffic analysis with a clean and modern interface.

Why this product is good

  • Proxyman.io is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and powerful features that make it an effective tool for web debugging. It supports a range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, and offers functionalities such as breakpoints, request/response modification, and SSL proxying. Its integration with MacOS makes it a preferred choice for developers in that ecosystem.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • Mobile developers
  • Security researchers
  • Quality assurance engineers

Proxyman.io videos

No Proxyman.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Proxyman.io and Apache Traffic Server)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy Server
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
74 74%
26% 26
Security
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Proxyman.io and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Proxyman.io and Apache Traffic Server

Proxyman.io Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Proxyman just like Paw is a native macOS web debugging proxy application. This tool stands as an intermediary or a man-in-the-middle server. With its built-in macOS setup, you can capture, inspect and get around HTTP(s) traffic, request, and responses easily. What set Proxyman aside from Paw is the fact that it is more advance in functionalities.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Similar to the above-mentioned Paw, Proxyman is a premium native macOS web debugging proxy application.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

Apache Traffic Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Traffic Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Proxyman.io should be more popular than Apache Traffic Server. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Proxyman.io mentions (25)

  • Catching useful errors when parsing JSON fails in Swift
    Armed with this you could now investigate the raw JSON using HTTP proxying (I like to use ProxyMan for this), and/or talk to the back-end team, see if they've made some changes and are aware of the breakage in the contract between client and server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Pākiki Proxy – An intercepting proxy for penetration pesting
    I previously used Proxyman [1] on iOS to the http requests send over TLS. It worked rather nicely. Proxyman in this case starts a VPN which handles all the traffic. It uses custom certificate to decrypt the messages. [1] https://proxyman.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • A collection of useful Mac Apps
    Proxyman - Price: Free (optional paid plans available) Modern and intuitive HTTP/HTTPS debugging proxy app for macOS. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What are your favorite apps that has active development? (frequent new features, bug fixes, etc)
    I'm using self-developed app MindMac daily to talk with ChatGPT, Proxyman to capture network, TablePlus to access databases and CleanshotX to take screenshots. All of them are currently in an active status. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Mac Power Users 690: Better Touch Tool with Andreas Hegenberg
    Links and Show Notes:More Power Users: Ad-free episodes with regular bonus segmentsSubmit Feedbackfolivora.ai - Great Tools for your Mac!iPhone Praktikum 2009GitHub - quicklywilliam/multiclutch: Customization App for Macbooks with MultiTouch supportHopperFSMonitorProxyman · Native, Modern Web Debugging Proxy · Inspect network traffic from Mac, iOS, Android devices with easeCharles Web Debugging Proxy • HTTP... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Proxyman.io and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

mitmproxy - mitmproxy is an SSL-capable man-in-the-middle proxy for HTTP.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?