Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Proxychains VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare Proxychains VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

Proxychains logo Proxychains

About proxychains tool: * It's a proxifier. * Latest version: 3.1

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.
  • Proxychains Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-18
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Proxychains features and specs

  • Anonymity
    Proxychains helps users maintain anonymity by routing their internet traffic through a series of proxy servers, which can conceal their true IP address.
  • Compatibility
    It can work with any application that has internet connectivity, providing flexibility in terms of applications that can leverage the proxying capabilities.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Proxychains allows users to inspect, modify, and enhance the software according to their needs without any restrictions.
  • Versatility
    Proxychains supports various types of proxies, including HTTP, SOCKS4, and SOCKS5, giving users multiple options for customizing their proxy configurations.

Possible disadvantages of Proxychains

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up Proxychains can be complex for beginners, requiring manual editing of configuration files to define proxy chains and routing rules.
  • Performance Overhead
    Routing traffic through multiple proxy servers can introduce latency and reduce the overall speed of internet connectivity.
  • Potential Incompatibility
    Some applications may not work correctly with Proxychains, especially if they have their own proxy or networking configurations that conflict with Proxychains settings.
  • Security Risks
    Using unknown or untrusted proxy servers can expose users to potential security risks, such as data interception or logging by malicious proxies.

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

Proxychains videos

Kali Linux 2017.2 - Review & Updates - Proxychains Working!

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Setup Proxychains In Kali Linux - #1 - Stay Anonymous

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Proxychains and Apache Traffic Server)
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy Server
0 0%
100% 100
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
41 41%
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Proxychains and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Proxychains mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Proxychains yet. Tracking of Proxychains recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Proxychains and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products

Proxifier - Proxifier extends the advantages of a proxy server to network applications that don't natively support it.

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Wide Cap - WideCap - is system proxifier. It was created as `extended` version of FreeCap program.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Proxycap - ProxyCap empowers you to divert your PC’s system associations through intermediary servers.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?