Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Protobuf VS RabbitMQ

Compare Protobuf VS RabbitMQ and see what are their differences

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Protobuf videos

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

RabbitMQ videos

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ??

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Protobuf and RabbitMQ)
Configuration Management
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Mobile Apps
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Protobuf and RabbitMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Protobuf and RabbitMQ

Protobuf Reviews

We have no reviews of Protobuf yet.
Be the first one to post

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf seems to be a lot more popular than RabbitMQ. While we know about 82 links to Protobuf, we've tracked only 1 mention of RabbitMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Protobuf mentions (82)

  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Understanding gRPC Concepts, Use Cases & Best Practices
    gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Protobuf and RabbitMQ, you can also consider the following products

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.