Software Alternatives & Reviews

ProjectManager.com VS Coq

Compare ProjectManager.com VS Coq and see what are their differences

ProjectManager.com logo ProjectManager.com

Online project management software for professionals. ProjectManager.com gives you a project dashboard for planning, tracking and collaboration real-time.

Coq logo Coq

Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...
  • ProjectManager.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-24
  • Coq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

ProjectManager.com videos

ProjectManager.com Starting a new project and adding users - Super Easy!

More videos:

  • Review - Gantt Chart Software: The Ultimate Guide (ProjectManager.com)

Coq videos

Ubiquinol CoQ-10 Supplement Review

More videos:

  • Review - Gumbenni listened to Sseth's review on Coq

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ProjectManager.com and Coq)
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Task Management
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ProjectManager.com and Coq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ProjectManager.com and Coq

ProjectManager.com Reviews

22 Best Wrike Alternatives For Project Management in 2020 (Free & Paid)
Pros: ProjectManager.com offers a full suite of project management functionality. It supports both Agile and Waterfall project methodologies. The software helps you manage projects and team progress, track time, collaborate, and report on how projects are going.

Coq Reviews

We have no reviews of Coq yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coq seems to be a lot more popular than ProjectManager.com. While we know about 46 links to Coq, we've tracked only 1 mention of ProjectManager.com. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ProjectManager.com mentions (1)

  • Considering PM
    Hello -- listen to some free recordings on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8_gaRIrrUw&list=PLF1064CD7B0A98261. This is projectmanager.com. Source: over 1 year ago

Coq mentions (46)

  • The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
    Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong
    Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?
    Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago
  • Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8
    Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 12 months ago
  • Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs
    This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ProjectManager.com and Coq, you can also consider the following products

ClickUp - ClickUp's #1 rated productivity software is making more productive projects with a beautifully designed and intuitive platform.

Agda - Agda is a dependently typed functional programming language. It has inductive families, i.e.

Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.

Isabelle - Isabelle is a proof assistant for writing and checking mathematical proofs by computer.

monday.com - The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork

Idris - Programming, Programming Language, Learning Resources, Languages, and Frontend Development