Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Profiling Viewer VS ftrace

Compare Profiling Viewer VS ftrace and see what are their differences

Profiling Viewer logo Profiling Viewer

Profiling Viewer for Mac OS X opens and visualizes callgrind files

ftrace logo ftrace

A function tracer for the Linux kernel.
  • Profiling Viewer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-28
  • ftrace Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-03

Profiling Viewer features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

ftrace features and specs

  • Function Tracing
    ftrace provides a robust function tracing capability that allows developers to track function calls within the Linux kernel. This helps in identifying performance bottlenecks and debugging complex issues.
  • Dynamic Tracing
    It supports dynamic tracing, which means that trace points can be added or removed at runtime without needing to reboot or recompile the kernel, offering flexibility and reducing downtime.
  • Performance Analysis
    ftrace can be used for detailed performance analysis, helping to monitor system performance and resource usage, which is crucial for optimizing system behavior.
  • Lightweight
    ftrace is designed to be lightweight, ensuring minimal performance overhead on the system, which is an essential feature for maintaining system stability and performance during tracing.
  • Wide Adaptability
    It's widely adaptable across different architectures and is included in the Linux kernel, making it a versatile tool for Linux developers.

Possible disadvantages of ftrace

  • Complexity
    Setting up and using ftrace can be complex, especially for beginners, due to its extensive options and configurations which might require a steep learning curve.
  • Limited User-space Tracing
    ftrace primarily focuses on kernel space, which means its capabilities for tracing user-space applications are limited compared to some other tools.
  • Potential for Large Data Volume
    The tool can generate a large amount of trace data, which can be overwhelming to manage and analyze, requiring efficient data handling and filtering techniques.
  • Kernel Version Dependent
    Since ftrace features are closely tied to the kernel version, using the latest functionalities requires updating to the latest kernel, which may not always be feasible in production environments.
  • Security Concerns
    Enabling tracing can potentially expose sensitive information or alter the system's behavior, raising security concerns if not properly managed.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Profiling Viewer and ftrace)
Software Development
24 24%
76% 76
IDE
23 23%
77% 77
Python IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Profiling Viewer and ftrace. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Profiling Viewer and ftrace, you can also consider the following products

Kcachegrind - Callgrind is a profiling tool and KCachegrind is able to visualize output of the profilers.

perf - Perf is a simple app monitoring solution paired with meaningful alerts.

WinCacheGrind - WinCacheGrind is a viewer for cachegrind.out files generated by xdebug 2.

strace - Trace system calls and signals. A diagnostic, debugging and instructional userspace utility.

Webgrind - Webgrind is an Xdebug profiling web frontend in PHP5.

DTrace - DTrace is a performance analysis and troubleshooting tool for Solaris, Mac OS X and FreeBSD.