Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Print Window VS Animate.css

Compare Print Window VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Print Window logo Print Window

Print Window allows you to generate file listings and print them or save them to multiple formats.

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.
  • Print Window Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-04
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Print Window features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Print Window offers an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, allowing users to quickly print directory lists without a steep learning curve.
  • Flexibility
    The application provides multiple options for customizing printed listings, including different styles and formats, which caters to a wide range of user preferences.
  • Integration with Finder
    Print Window integrates seamlessly with macOS Finder, allowing users to print directly from the Finder window, thereby streamlining the workflow.

Possible disadvantages of Print Window

  • Platform Limitation
    Print Window is only available for macOS, which excludes Windows and Linux users from utilizing the software.
  • Feature Limitations in Free Version
    The free version of Print Window has limited features compared to the Pro version, which may require users to purchase the software for full functionality.
  • Design Aesthetic
    While functional, the user interface might appear dated to some users, especially those accustomed to more modern design aesthetics.

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Print Window and Animate.css)
File Management
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Print Window and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animate.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Print Window mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Print Window yet. Tracking of Print Window recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Print Window and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products

Filelist Creator - For the various occasions, lists of files or directories are required: perhaps you need an index of...

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Karen's Directory Printer - Easily print files and folders list on Windows! Catalog name, size, date, attributes, file hashes like SHA-256, and more.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Q-Dir - . Q-Dir the free Filemanager for Windows. # About # Help file # Screenshots # History # Faq # .

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design