Prettier VS UI Jar

In this post, I also use ESLint + Standard JS as my code formatting tools. Formatting JS/TS code by using ESLint is also subjective and opinionated, arguably most people would rather use Prettier instead, which provides more configurable options. - Source: dev.to / about 11 hours ago

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago

No formatting inconsistencies: The committed code should follow the organization's code formatting standards(prettier or pretty-quick). - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago

UI Jar: This is one of the better ones for “general” category. Check it out yourself. It has some extensive filters. Source: 10 months ago