Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Prettier VS Orwell Dev-C

Compare Prettier VS Orwell Dev-C and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Prettier logo Prettier

An opinionated code formatter

Orwell Dev-C logo Orwell Dev-C

The official site of the Bloodshed Dev-C++ update, which is fully portable, and optionally ships with a 64bit compiler.
  • Prettier Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-27
  • Orwell Dev-C Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

Prettier features and specs

  • Consistency
    Ensures a uniform code style across different files and projects, reducing code review conflicts and making it easier for team members to work on the same codebase.
  • Time-saving
    Automates code formatting, which saves developers time that they would otherwise spend on manually formatting code.
  • Integrations
    Works well with various code editors, IDEs, and continuous integration tools, making it easy to integrate into existing workflows.
  • Language Support
    Supports a wide range of programming languages and file types beyond JavaScript, including TypeScript, CSS, HTML, Markdown, JSON, and more.
  • Community and Documentation
    Backed by a strong community and comprehensive documentation that provide quick solutions and guide you through setup and customization.

Possible disadvantages of Prettier

  • Lack of Customization
    Prettier enforces a specific set of rules and offers limited customization options compared to other linters or formatters, which may not satisfy all coding style preferences.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a learning curve when configuring and integrating Prettier into their existing workflow, especially if they are not familiar with code formatters.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Prettier on large projects can introduce performance overhead, particularly during automated tasks like pre-commit hooks or continuous integration processes.
  • Conflict with Existing Tools
    May conflict with other code linters and formatters, requiring additional configuration to ensure compatibility and avoid duplicated efforts.

Orwell Dev-C features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    Orwell Dev-C++ is distributed freely and is open source, which means users can modify and distribute the software according to the open-source license.
  • Lightweight IDE
    The IDE is notably lightweight and fast, making it suitable for smaller projects and older hardware where performance might be an issue.
  • Simple Interface
    Orwell Dev-C++ has a straightforward and simple user interface, which is easy for beginners to understand and use for basic C/C++ programming tasks.
  • Integrated Debugging
    The IDE provides integrated debugging capabilities, which helps developers in testing and troubleshooting their code more effectively within the environment.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Although primarily focused on C and C++, it supports additional languages making it a versatile tool for developers working with multiple programming languages.

Possible disadvantages of Orwell Dev-C

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to newer IDEs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains CLion, Orwell Dev-C++ lacks some advanced features and integrations that are common in other environments.
  • Scarce Updates
    The software does not frequently receive updates, which can lead to issues with modern development practices or compatibility with newer C++ standards.
  • Outdated Design
    The interface design can seem outdated, which might not appeal to developers accustomed to more modern design aesthetics in software.
  • Limited Support for Large Projects
    While suitable for small to medium projects, it is not as equipped to handle large-scale development tasks efficiently, which can be a drawback for professional environments.
  • Poor Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a lack of community-driven plugins and extensions compared to other popular IDEs, limiting the ability to extend the functionality easily.

Prettier videos

Code Formatting with Prettier in Visual Studio Code

More videos:

  • Review - ESLint + Prettier + VS Code — The Perfect Setup
  • Review - Miranda Lambert -- Only Prettier [REVIEW/RATING]

Orwell Dev-C videos

No Orwell Dev-C videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Prettier and Orwell Dev-C)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Prettier and Orwell Dev-C. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Prettier seems to be a lot more popular than Orwell Dev-C. While we know about 288 links to Prettier, we've tracked only 1 mention of Orwell Dev-C. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Prettier mentions (288)

  • Should you stop using prettier? Maybe
    For years, I've been prettier's biggest fan... Introducing it to every codebase at a new role, instantly adding it to any new repository, installing additional plugins such as tailwind or xml and of course, ensuring the "Format on save" option is switched on. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • 🚀 Biome Has Entered the Chat: A New Tool to Replace ESLint and Prettier
    If you’ve ever set up a JavaScript or TypeScript project, chances are you've spent way too much time configuring ESLint, Prettier, and their dozens of plugins. We’ve all been there — fiddling with .eslintrc, fighting with formatting conflicts, and installing what feels like half the npm registry just to get decent code quality tooling. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Mastering JavaScript Syntax with the Help of AI
    Use tools like Prettier to reformat code when things get messy. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Matanuska ADR 017 - Vitest, Vite, Grabthar, Oh My!
    Unfortunately, this did mean that configuration began to sprawl. At this point, I had configurations not just for Vite (shared with Vitest) and tsc, but also for Prettier, ESLint and even ShellCheck. Many of these files had shared settings that needed to match each other. This was somewhat manageable, until Vite was also in the mix. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • How to Set Up ESLint, Prettier, and Husky in Next.js ?
    2. Prettier Website : https://prettier.io/ Prettier is the opinionated code formatter that automatically formats your code to make it consistent and readable.it supports so many languages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Orwell Dev-C mentions (1)

  • IDE for windows-xp
    I used to use Dev-C++ back in the day. Last release was in 2015, unsure if it supports XP, but you could always keep going backwards until you find a working one. http://orwelldevcpp.blogspot.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Prettier and Orwell Dev-C, you can also consider the following products

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Netbeans - NetBeans IDE 7.0. Develop desktop, mobile and web applications with Java, PHP, C/C++ and more. Runs on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and Solaris. NetBeans IDE is open-source and free.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

KDevelop - KDevelop is a free, open source IDE (Integrated Development Environment) for Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X and other Unix flavors.