Based on our record, Prettier seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Scan. While we know about 258 links to Prettier, we've tracked only 12 mentions of CSS Scan. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
A big part of my work revolves around JavaScript tooling, and as such it's important to keep an eye on the ecosystem and see where things are going. It's no secret that recently lots of projects are native-ying (??) parts of their codebase, or even rewriting them to native languages altogether. Esbuild is one of the first popular and successful examples of this, which was written in Go. Other examples are Rspack... - Source: dev.to / about 10 hours ago
Do you use Prettier? Have your configuration settings caused weird HTML rendering issues by adding extra whitespace where you didn't want it? Perhaps after an anchor link at the end of a paragraph? Me, too. Here's what's happening and how you might be able to fix it. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
In this post, I also use ESLint + Standard JS as my code formatting tools. Formatting JS/TS code by using ESLint is also subjective and opinionated, arguably most people would rather use Prettier instead, which provides more configurable options. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: 12 months ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 1 year ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: over 1 year ago
🔺 A curated collection of 57 free shapes examples made with pure CSS: 👉 https://getcssscan.com/css-shapes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.