Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

pre-commit by Yelp VS GitBucket

Compare pre-commit by Yelp VS GitBucket and see what are their differences

pre-commit by Yelp logo pre-commit by Yelp

A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks

GitBucket logo GitBucket

GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.
  • pre-commit by Yelp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-08
  • GitBucket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

pre-commit by Yelp features and specs

  • Comprehensive Hook Management
    Pre-commit provides a robust framework to manage and configure git hooks in a standardized way, simplifying the process of ensuring code quality.
  • Language Agnostic
    Supports hooks written in all kinds of languages including Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc., making it versatile and adaptable to any codebase.
  • Ease of Setup
    Installing and configuring pre-commit hooks is straightforward, often just involving the addition of a simple configuration file to the repository.
  • Version Control
    Pre-commit ensures that the same versions of hooks are consistently run across developers' environments by locking the version of each hook.
  • Centralized Configuration
    Project-wide configuration means that all contributors use the same hooks and settings, fostering code consistency and quality.

Possible disadvantages of pre-commit by Yelp

  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve initially when setting up a configuration file and understanding how to integrate it with existing workflows.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running hooks can add a noticeable delay when committing code, especially in larger projects with many hooks.
  • Dependency Management
    Some hooks might introduce additional dependencies that need to be managed within the project's environment.
  • Complex Configuration for Advanced Use
    While simple setups are easy, more complex configurations can become intricate and harder to manage.
  • Limited to Pre-defined Hooks
    If a desired hook isn't available, users may have to create their own, which can require additional effort and maintenance.

GitBucket features and specs

  • Simple Setup
    GitBucket is relatively easy to set up and requires minimal configuration, making it accessible for users who may not be as technically inclined.
  • Integrated Wiki and Issues
    GitBucket provides integrated support for wikis and issue tracking, allowing teams to manage project documentation and track issues in one place.
  • Plugin System
    The platform supports a flexible plugin system, enabling users to extend the functionality of GitBucket to fit their specific needs.
  • Supports GitHub API
    GitBucket supports much of the GitHub API, which allows for better compatibility with tools and services that integrate with GitHub.
  • Low Resource Use
    GitBucket is known for its low resource consumption compared to some other Git hosting solutions, making it suitable for environments with limited resources.

Possible disadvantages of GitBucket

  • Limited Scalability
    GitBucket may not scale as well as other enterprise-level solutions, which could be a limitation for very large projects or organizations.
  • Interface
    The user interface of GitBucket may not be as polished or intuitive as other popular Git hosting platforms like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Community Size
    The community and development support for GitBucket are smaller compared to larger platforms, which might result in slower updates and fewer available extensions.
  • Dependency on JVM
    GitBucket runs on the Java Virtual Machine, which means it requires a JVM to be installed, potentially complicating deployment in certain environments.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    GitBucket may lack some advanced features found in more comprehensive solutions like GitLab or Bitbucket, such as advanced CI/CD pipelines or built-in container registries.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pre-commit by Yelp and GitBucket)
Git
44 44%
56% 56
Code Collaboration
35 35%
65% 65
Kids
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using pre-commit by Yelp and GitBucket. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pre-commit by Yelp seems to be a lot more popular than GitBucket. While we know about 151 links to pre-commit by Yelp, we've tracked only 2 mentions of GitBucket. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pre-commit by Yelp mentions (151)

  • Python MCP Remote Server — The Dawn of the Streamable HTTP Era ~ With a Minimalist Template Featuring uv / Docker / pytest ~
    Pre-commit: A framework for automatically running predefined checks (hooks) before Git commits (official website). pre-commit itself is also installed as a development dependency with uv pip install -e ".[dev,test]". To start using it, run pre-commit install once in the repository root. This sets up the Git hooks, and checks will run automatically on subsequent commits. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • Scalable Python backend: Building a containerized FastAPI Application with uv, Docker, and pre-commit: a step-by-step guide
    Pre-commit is a framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks, ensuring consistency and quality in your codebase by running checks before a commit is finalized. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Crafting a Custom SAM Template for Your AWS Lambda Function, Resource, and Operations
    Just give you an idea of how to implement a template for serverless in your organization; you can create multiple cases and embed the practice of your organization to the template like pre-commit, cicd, lambda-layer-secret, lambda-layer-powertools and more. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • 12 Steps to Organize and Maintain Your Python Codebase for Beginners
    Instead of running these tools manually every time you make changes, you can automate the process with pre-commit hooks. Pre-commit hooks run automatically before each commit, blocking the commit if any tool fails. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How I use git
    Our team is small and we use:
      git hooks from https://pre-commit.com.
    - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

GitBucket mentions (2)

  • Selfhosted open source alternative to GitHub/GitLab
    I saw this on HN and have been using it for the past two weeks for some small hobby projects. The docs are so-so but I got it set up in Docker without much hassle. I've since migrated completely from gitbucket. Great software - I encourage everyone to try it out. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Scala projects to read through
    A Git platform (like github or gitlab) written in Scala. Definitely not a pet project so might be fun to read the code. Https://github.com/gitbucket/gitbucket. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pre-commit by Yelp and GitBucket, you can also consider the following products

Python Poetry - Python packaging and dependency manager.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

mypy - Mypy is an experimental optional static type checker for Python that aims to combine the benefits of dynamic (or "duck") typing and static typing.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.