Software Alternatives & Reviews

Practical Common Lisp VS IHP

Compare Practical Common Lisp VS IHP and see what are their differences

Practical Common Lisp logo Practical Common Lisp

Learning Resources

IHP logo IHP

The fastest way to buildtype safe web apps ๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • Practical Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-25
  • IHP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-01

Practical Common Lisp videos

Practical Common Lisp

More videos:

  • Review - Practical Common Lisp

IHP videos

IHP NATIONAl MODEL 35-Review and specs-Must Watch-๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ‘!!!

More videos:

  • Review - IHP Internship, Semi-Annual Sale, Grill Review, Resistance Training Book, Green Tea, Evolution
  • Review - IHP National 35 review (.22 cal)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Practical Common Lisp and IHP)
Online Learning
100 100%
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Education
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Practical Common Lisp and IHP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Practical Common Lisp might be a bit more popular than IHP. We know about 48 links to it since March 2021 and only 40 links to IHP. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Practical Common Lisp mentions (48)

  • The Loudest Lisp Program
    There are a bunch of things to learn from Lisp: * list processing -> model data as lists and process those * list processing applied to Lisp -> model programs as lists and process those -> EVAL and COMPILE * EVAL, the interpreter as a Lisp program * write programs to process programs -> code generators, macros, ... * write programs in a more declarative way -> a code generator transforms the description into... - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • Racket Language
    In respect to Common Lisp, you could look into "Common Lisp Recipes" by Weitz[2], and "Practical Common Lisp" by Seibel[1]. These are industrial-strength systems which were used to built large airline reservation systems. Scheme is in a way more minimalist and Schemes are not as large, but this might also be give an erroneous impression because they build on the enormous experience with Common Lisp and have boiled... - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • Steel โ€“ An embedded scheme interpreter in Rust
    Not exactly what you asked for but, if you have time, I would recommend looking at Practical Common Lisp: https://gigamonkeys.com/book/ And also this blog post (which is a much smaller time commitment): https://mikelevins.github.io/posts/2020-12-18-repl-driven/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Common Lisp: An Interactive Approach (1992) [pdf]
    If someone is considering learning CL effectively, take this piece of advice: use Emacs. You might think that it's an outdated piece of shit, maybe you hate RMS with a passion or whatever. But make yourself a favour and use it at least for the month that will take you to go through a manual like this or Practical Common Lisp or several others. Just install SBCL, QuickLisp, Emacs and SLIME (or Sly, that is a more... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Code Is Not Literature
    And Practical Common Lisp, another popular one on HN. The domain name took me by surprised and I struggled to remember why it seemed so familiar; it turns out that PCL can be found in its entirety here, and I had used it years ago to learn CL: https://gigamonkeys.com/book. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

IHP mentions (40)

  • Vue 3.3.6 Faster Thanks to WeakMaps
    > Does elixir have an lsp as good as Typescripts? Iโ€™m a bit addicted to static types at the moment. I wonder how IHP [1], the liveview in Haskell, compares with Phoenix liveview for typical use cases now. (Not having used either.) [1]: https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: Why are all of the best back end web frameworks dynamically typed?
    I found IHP straightforward: https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/ despite not remembering much haskell! This assumes you can get past nix for the install. I find IHP well-designed. I just wish the licensing scheme were more transparent. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: Why are all of the best back end web frameworks dynamically typed?
    IHP is a batteries-included web framework similar to "ruby on rails" for Haskell, with strong static typing. The website has lots of information and videos and beginner tutorials. https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Servant or framework
    You can find the docs at https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/ and some getting started videos at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLl9Sjq6Nzc&list=PLenFm8BWuKlS0IaE31DmKB_PbkMLmwWmG. Source: 11 months ago
  • Using Rust at a startup: A cautionary tale
    To be fair, https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/ looks really tempting. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Practical Common Lisp and IHP, you can also consider the following products

Land of Lisp - Learning Resources

Scotty - Scotty is a Haskell framework inspired by Ruby's Sinatra.

On Lisp - Learning Resources

Happstack Lite - Happstack itself is a web framework created in Haskell. Happstack Lite is an easier version to use that can import features from the heftier version if need be.

Racket Lang - Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...

wai-routes - Type safe routing framework for wai