Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
JP

PortMapper VS JPerf

Compare PortMapper VS JPerf and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PortMapper logo PortMapper

Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.
  • PortMapper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-24
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10

PortMapper features and specs

  • Freeware
    PortMapper is available as freeware, meaning it can be used without any cost, making it accessible for users who are looking for a budget-friendly solution.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    PortMapper provides an easy-to-use interface, allowing users to set up port forwarding without much technical expertise.
  • Lightweight
    The software is lightweight, ensuring it doesn't consume significant system resources, which is beneficial for performance.
  • Simple Configuration
    The software allows for quick and simple configuration of ports, useful for users who need to set up port forwarding quickly.

Possible disadvantages of PortMapper

  • Limited Advanced Features
    PortMapper lacks some advanced features that might be necessary for power users or more complex network setups.
  • Windows Only
    The application is only available for Windows, limiting its usability for users on other operating systems like macOS or Linux.
  • Lack of Support
    As a freeware product, PortMapper might not offer robust customer support or regular updates, which can be a drawback for users who may need assistance.
  • Potential Security Risks
    As with any port forwarding tool, there are potential security risks if not configured correctly, possibly exposing the network to vulnerabilities.

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

PortMapper videos

No PortMapper videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

JPerf videos

+ Add

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PortMapper and JPerf)

PortMapper

JPerf

Monitoring Tools
39 39%
Monitoring Tools
61% 61
Log Management
39 39%
Log Management
61% 61
Network & Admin
29 29%
Network & Admin
71% 71
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PortMapper and JPerf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PortMapper and JPerf, you can also consider the following products

Port Map - TheCodingMonkeys, authors of software like SubEthaEdit.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

AUTAPF - Reliable TCP and UDP port forwarding for Windows.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

Simple Port Forwarding - Simple Port Forwarding works with WebPages and not directly with your router.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

Loading...