Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Portmap.io VS Netmaker

Compare Portmap.io VS Netmaker and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Portmap.io logo Portmap.io

Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Netmaker logo Netmaker

Netmaker automates mesh VPN's and software-defined networks using WireGuard.
  • Portmap.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-24
  • Netmaker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-12

Portmap.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Portmap.io offers a simple interface that makes it easy for users to set up port forwarding without needing advanced networking knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    The service supports multiple tunneling protocols including OpenVPN and SSH, providing versatility depending on user needs.
  • Cost-effective
    Portmap.io offers both free and paid plans, allowing users to choose a service level that fits their budget while still providing essential features.
  • Compatibility
    The service is compatible with various operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • No Need for Static IP
    Users can access their internal services over the internet without requiring a static IP address.

Possible disadvantages of Portmap.io

  • Limited Bandwidth
    The free plan has bandwidth limitations that may not be suitable for high-traffic applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Using port forwarding services can introduce security risks if not properly configured or if the service has vulnerabilities.
  • Reliability
    As with many online services, there can be downtime or maintenance periods which may affect service availability.
  • Dependency on Third-party Service
    Relying on an external service for port forwarding can be a disadvantage if the service experiences issues or discontinues.
  • Configuration Limits
    Advanced users might find the configuration options somewhat limited compared to setting up port forwarding manually on their own networks.

Netmaker features and specs

  • Scalability
    Netmaker is designed to easily scale with growing network demands, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Performance
    The platform optimizes for speed and low-latency connections, which enhances overall network efficiency and user experience.
  • Security
    Netmaker provides robust security features, including encryption and controlled access, which help protect network data and reduce vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Automated network management features simplify the process of setting up and maintaining virtual networks, reducing manual work and potential errors.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Netmaker supports a wide range of operating systems, allowing seamless integration across diverse device landscapes.

Possible disadvantages of Netmaker

  • Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a certain level of technical knowledge, which might be challenging for non-technical users.
  • Cost
    While offering a free tier, the advanced features and enterprise-level services come at a cost that might not fit within all organizations' budgets.
  • Limited Support
    As of now, support options may be limited, which could be a drawback for users who require extensive customer service or immediate assistance.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and capabilities, new users might experience a steep learning curve when adapting to the platform.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running the software might be resource-intensive on certain systems, potentially requiring upgrades or additional hardware investment.

Analysis of Portmap.io

Overall verdict

  • Portmap.io is generally considered a good tool for its ease of use, reliability, and features such as SSL support and a user-friendly interface. However, users should be aware of potential security risks when exposing local services to the public internet.

Why this product is good

  • Portmap.io is a popular choice for users looking to expose local servers to the internet without dealing with complex network configurations like port forwarding. It provides a straightforward solution for developers wanting to test, share, or access services remotely.

Recommended for

    Developers, system administrators, and hobbyists who need to access local services remotely or those testing webhooks and other remote internet applications.

Portmap.io videos

Port Forward without Router using portmap.io

More videos:

  • Review - portmap.io portforwarding with Android FUD RAT live practical hindi
  • Review - NJRAT LimeRAT Portmap.io - free port forwarding solution NJRAT LimeRAT

Netmaker videos

免费开源的组网神器NetMaker,wireguard协议LAN to LAN对等网络

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Netmaker v0.2 - Site to Site and Gateway over WireGuard Tutorial
  • Review - Netmaker - A powerful, open source, self hosted, GUI for setting up Wireguard networks and VPNs.
  • Review - Automated Failover / Relay for WireGuard ® Networks with Netmaker EE

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portmap.io and Netmaker)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
VPN
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Infrastructure
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Portmap.io and Netmaker.

What makes your product unique?

Netmaker's answer:

  1. Netmaker uses kernel WireGuard, which makes it way faster and more modern than the alternatives.
  2. Netmaker can also be fully "self-hosted" so you don't have to rely on a 3rd party with potential access to your sensitive data. 3 Netmaker creates a Mesh VPN, which is like the best of software-defined networking, zero trust, and VPNs all combined into one.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Netmaker's answer:

Netmaker is faster, more configurable, cheaper, and can be fully-self hosted. With Netmaker, you're in control.

How would you describe your primary audience?

Netmaker's answer:

IT admins, sysadmins, DevOps, InfraOps, platform engineers, and developers.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Netmaker's answer:

WireGuard, Golang, and Docker.

User comments

Share your experience with using Portmap.io and Netmaker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Portmap.io and Netmaker

Portmap.io Reviews

  1. WORST SERVICE i ever see

    Did not worked at all. No VPN connections, NO ssh connections... Did not work at all. No option to connect. Not working in my country and "No refund" :(

    I got fooled with such fake service. NOT RECOMMENDING. use ngrok instead. Better for 800% that this

    🏁 Competitors: Simple Port Forwarding
    👎 Cons:    Design|Price|Pricing|Ssh|Not working|Fake

Netmaker Reviews

We have no reviews of Netmaker yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Netmaker should be more popular than Portmap.io. It has been mentiond 63 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portmap.io mentions (34)

  • How do hackers hide their ip in reverse shells?
    I once used portmap.io for reverse shell in ethical hacking classes. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • OpenVPNnot working and i dont know what to do
    So I use portmap.io for OpenVPN like I saw in tutorials but I found out it is not working because my ip didn't change when I looked up what my ip was. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • SSH into a personal computer in Jio Network using public IP
    I have a personal computer in the Jio Network at my home and I want to access it using ssh from another network. But in order to port forward my router I am stuck since Jio uses CGNAT if I am not mistaken and there is no use if I portforward. What other solutions do I have? I tried using portmap.io but I couldnt configure ssh in it (I dont want to use openVPN) so what other options do I have? Source: over 2 years ago
  • port forwarding/tunneling
    I'm basically looking for a free version of https://portmap.io/ -- they will do this, but custom domains are $4/month. Source: over 2 years ago
  • port triggering to replace port forwarding
    I would recommend trying again with port forwarding, or some other solution like this: https://portmap.io/ which is a kind of reverse tunnel made for situations like yours. That site has a free tier which allows a single forward. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Netmaker mentions (63)

  • PrivateVPN is horrible. Don't do it.
    With Netmaker, you can have greater control and customization by assigning dedicated IP addresses to specific nodes within your network. I just stumble upon it yesterday, check it out. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Benefit of connect device under NAT to VPN network
    These days, I'm trying to deploy full mesh VPN network with netmaker. It is really easy to use and manage. However there are something makes me confused. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Web based self service CA for OpenVPN
    If a TCP based protocol isn't an absolute must have, I'd ditch OpenVPN for Wireguard with some kind of management overlay. e.g netmaker. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Tailscale increased free plan user limit form 1 to 3 and device cap to 100 also... unlimited subnets
    Do the net maker https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker worth trying to use instead of Tailscale? Tailscale is good, but I can watch YouTube over Wi-Fi in another country, but when I try to use Jellyfin to watch movies it’s not loading well. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Tips & Tricks for Productivity with Android E-Ink Devices (Obsidian, Syncthing, Weylus, RustDesk, Termux, KDE Connect, ZeroTier)
    Very relatable! At first, I struggled for days trying to make Netmaker or Innernet functional for my personal home server (Raspberry Pi behind multiple routers). But then I stumbled upon ZeroTier, and everything worked seamlessly within a couple of hours. Tailscale was actually the next one on my list because I heard many positive things about it over at r/selfhosted (especially about headscale). However, I did... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Portmap.io and Netmaker, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

TailScale - Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Headscale - An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server