Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Portmap.io VS Caddy

Compare Portmap.io VS Caddy and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Portmap.io logo Portmap.io

Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Caddy logo Caddy

The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS
  • Portmap.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-24
  • Caddy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-22

Portmap.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Portmap.io offers a simple interface that makes it easy for users to set up port forwarding without needing advanced networking knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    The service supports multiple tunneling protocols including OpenVPN and SSH, providing versatility depending on user needs.
  • Cost-effective
    Portmap.io offers both free and paid plans, allowing users to choose a service level that fits their budget while still providing essential features.
  • Compatibility
    The service is compatible with various operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • No Need for Static IP
    Users can access their internal services over the internet without requiring a static IP address.

Possible disadvantages of Portmap.io

  • Limited Bandwidth
    The free plan has bandwidth limitations that may not be suitable for high-traffic applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Using port forwarding services can introduce security risks if not properly configured or if the service has vulnerabilities.
  • Reliability
    As with many online services, there can be downtime or maintenance periods which may affect service availability.
  • Dependency on Third-party Service
    Relying on an external service for port forwarding can be a disadvantage if the service experiences issues or discontinues.
  • Configuration Limits
    Advanced users might find the configuration options somewhat limited compared to setting up port forwarding manually on their own networks.

Caddy features and specs

  • Automatic HTTPS
    Caddy automatically handles HTTPS by obtaining and renewing certificates from Let's Encrypt, simplifying the process of securing web applications.
  • Ease of Configuration
    Caddy uses a straightforward configuration file (Caddyfile) that is easier to write and understand compared to other web servers like Nginx or Apache.
  • Cross-Platform
    Caddy is designed to run efficiently on virtually any platform, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Docker, giving it great flexibility for deployment.
  • Built-in Reverse Proxy
    Caddy includes built-in support for reverse proxy functionality, which can easily be configured to distribute load among multiple servers.
  • Extensible
    Caddy supports plugins for additional features, allowing users to extend its functionality without compromising its core simplicity.
  • Integrated Logging and Metrics
    Caddy includes integrated logging and monitoring capabilities, which make it easier to maintain and debug the server without additional tools.
  • Active Community and Support
    Caddy has an active community and is well-supported with extensive documentation, which helps new users get up to speed quickly and troubleshoot issues effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Caddy

  • Memory Usage
    Caddy can have higher memory usage compared to other web servers like Nginx, which might be a concern for resource-constrained environments.
  • TLS Configuration Complexity
    While Caddy handles basic HTTPS automatically, advanced TLS configurations can be more complicated to manage and may require a deeper understanding.
  • Learning Curve for New Features
    As Caddy rapidly evolves and adds new features, there can be a learning curve associated with keeping up to date on the latest changes and functionalities.
  • Performance
    Although Caddy performs adequately for many use cases, it may not match the high performance of optimized setups with other web servers like Nginx in highly demanding environments.
  • Licensing Costs
    While Caddy is open source, certain features are available under a commercial license. Organizations may incur additional costs for enterprise-grade functionality.

Analysis of Portmap.io

Overall verdict

  • Portmap.io is generally considered a good tool for its ease of use, reliability, and features such as SSL support and a user-friendly interface. However, users should be aware of potential security risks when exposing local services to the public internet.

Why this product is good

  • Portmap.io is a popular choice for users looking to expose local servers to the internet without dealing with complex network configurations like port forwarding. It provides a straightforward solution for developers wanting to test, share, or access services remotely.

Recommended for

    Developers, system administrators, and hobbyists who need to access local services remotely or those testing webhooks and other remote internet applications.

Analysis of Caddy

Overall verdict

  • Caddy is generally considered a good choice for developers looking for a hassle-free, secure, and modern web server. Its automatic HTTPS and easy configuration make it particularly appealing for small teams and developers who need to deploy web services quickly without diving deep into server setup complexities.

Why this product is good

  • Caddy, available at caddyserver.com, is praised for its ease of use, automatic HTTPS configuration, and modern design. It features an intuitive configuration system and comes with a built-in SSL/TLS to automatically manage HTTPS certificates using Let's Encrypt. Caddy is highly regarded for its simple deployment, minimal configuration, and the ability to serve static and dynamic content efficiently. It also supports HTTP/2 and QUIC protocols, making it a future-proof choice for web servers.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized web developers who require quick and secure web server deployments.
  • Developers who prefer automatic HTTPS setups.
  • Projects that benefit from modern protocols like HTTP/2 and QUIC.
  • Users looking for a straightforward configuration process with minimal overhead.

Portmap.io videos

Port Forward without Router using portmap.io

More videos:

  • Review - portmap.io portforwarding with Android FUD RAT live practical hindi
  • Review - NJRAT LimeRAT Portmap.io - free port forwarding solution NJRAT LimeRAT

Caddy videos

Getting started with Caddy the HTTPS Web Server from scratch

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portmap.io and Caddy)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using Portmap.io and Caddy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Portmap.io and Caddy

Portmap.io Reviews

  1. WORST SERVICE i ever see

    Did not worked at all. No VPN connections, NO ssh connections... Did not work at all. No option to connect. Not working in my country and "No refund" :(

    I got fooled with such fake service. NOT RECOMMENDING. use ngrok instead. Better for 800% that this

    🏁 Competitors: Simple Port Forwarding
    👎 Cons:    Design|Price|Pricing|Ssh|Not working|Fake

Caddy Reviews

Self Hosting Like Its 2025
If you’re looking to forego fancy web interfaces and prefer editing a straightforward file while having the server manage everything from proxying to HTTPS via Let’s Encrypt, then this is the option for you. However, due to the absence of a web interface, I wouldn’t recommend it for complete beginners. But if you appreciate simple UNIX-based tooling, Caddy is an excellent...
Source: kiranet.org
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
Now that we know their advantages and disadvantages, which web server is the best? The answer depends on your use case. Nginx is a very fast and powerful option, Apache is a great general-purpose web server, while LiteSpeed represents a premium alternative. Caddy works great if you need simplicity, while Lighthttpd works best when resources are low.
Source: bigstep.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Caddy should be more popular than Portmap.io. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portmap.io mentions (34)

  • How do hackers hide their ip in reverse shells?
    I once used portmap.io for reverse shell in ethical hacking classes. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • OpenVPNnot working and i dont know what to do
    So I use portmap.io for OpenVPN like I saw in tutorials but I found out it is not working because my ip didn't change when I looked up what my ip was. Source: about 2 years ago
  • SSH into a personal computer in Jio Network using public IP
    I have a personal computer in the Jio Network at my home and I want to access it using ssh from another network. But in order to port forward my router I am stuck since Jio uses CGNAT if I am not mistaken and there is no use if I portforward. What other solutions do I have? I tried using portmap.io but I couldnt configure ssh in it (I dont want to use openVPN) so what other options do I have? Source: over 2 years ago
  • port forwarding/tunneling
    I'm basically looking for a free version of https://portmap.io/ -- they will do this, but custom domains are $4/month. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • port triggering to replace port forwarding
    I would recommend trying again with port forwarding, or some other solution like this: https://portmap.io/ which is a kind of reverse tunnel made for situations like yours. That site has a free tier which allows a single forward. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Caddy mentions (248)

  • I no longer have an old-school cert on my HTTPS site
    The Caddy[1] webserver also has built-in ACME. It has all the problems Rachel mentioned, of course, because now it's an ACME client embedded in an even bigger piece of software, but it's handy for sure! I don't know much about Caddy scalability but it's worked great for my personal sites. [1] https://caddyserver.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
  • How I made my Home Server accessible outside my home
    This single record will suffice as we will be using a reverse proxy to map each of our application. For the reverse proxy solution, we will be using Caddy, particularly xcaddy. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Simple Web Server
    It looks nice and friendly, but for developers I can recommend exploring caddy[1] or nginx[2]. It's a useful technology to have worked with, even if they're ultimately only used for proxying analytics. [1] https://caddyserver.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Adventures in Homelabbing: From Cloud Obsession to Self-Hosted Shenanigans
    I began to self-host a Minecraft server using Crafty Controller, an Excalidraw instance, Docmost to replace Notion, Plane to replace Jira, and Penpot to replace Figma. To be able to access them from the internet, I used Nginx Proxy Manager to set up reverse proxies with SSL. You can use Traefik or Caddy instead, but I enjoyed the ease-of-use of NPM. For a dashboard solution, I started with Homarr, but later... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Self-hosting with Caddy Server And Souin (Caching Module)
    Caddy is the ultimate web server anyone should be using. This is true for production as well as for local development. It is very fast, and by default obtains and renews SSL certificates automatically. This is useful for when you want to test certain website feature that is only allowed when they're accessed with HTTPS. You get free TLS for all your subdomains, and it does that in a scalable way. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Portmap.io and Caddy, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Nginx Proxy Manager - Docker container and built in Web Application for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface, providing free SSL support via Let's Encrypt