Software Alternatives & Reviews

Porter VS aerc

Compare Porter VS aerc and see what are their differences

Porter logo Porter

Heroku that runs in your own cloud

aerc logo aerc

Highly efficient and extensible email client for the terminal
  • Porter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-26
  • aerc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Porter videos

Porter Robinson - Nurture ALBUM REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Porter app information and review in Hindi. ( Live Late night booking in Hyderabad)
  • Review - Are these the BEST Blank T-Shirts? (Rue Porter Review)

aerc videos

Control Check Exam, AERC Educational Series

More videos:

  • Review - Temperature controller (subzero) Arihant Electrical & Refrigeration Centre | AERC | part 2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Porter and aerc)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Email
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Email Clients
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Porter and aerc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, aerc should be more popular than Porter. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Porter mentions (4)

aerc mentions (18)

  • Email and Git = <3
    You have some points, for some I do think it isn't as bad as you write. FWIW, some comments inline. > - You can't subscribe to a single PR/bug/feature-request thread. Subscription to the mailing list is all-or-nothing. And no, setting up email filters is not a reasonable solution. You can use tools like public-inbox or lei, the former is hosted for bigger projects on https://lore.kernel.org/ If you're interested,... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
    > Another problem is how badly email threading is displayed in these clients. Email UI is still abysmal. Fair point. However, given that the current alternative is "use another service entirely (e.g. GitHub)", I think it would be fair to assume that devs could choose a good e-mail client and learn how to format such e-mails correctly. It works for Linux, for instance. I started using Aerc, and I love it:... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • A Quick Guide to Mutt
    For fans of Mutt/NeoMutt looking to try something new, I've been getting a lot of mileage out of Aerc[1] and can recommend it as a somewhat more approachable alternative for the Mutt-curious. [1] https://aerc-mail.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Codeberg (a non profit code hosting platform) launches Forgejo (a fork of gitea)
    Try aerc, I recently set it up and it was really easy to do. The only tricky part was making it so my password is read from the KDE wallet instead of being stored as plain text in the config file. Source: over 1 year ago
  • it's not a text editor if i can't use vim bindings
    I'm not sure how much longer, but at least for me aerc still works with Outlook e-mails. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Porter and aerc, you can also consider the following products

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Mu4e - Starting with version 0.9.8, mu provides an emacs-based e-mail client which uses mu as its back-end: mu4e.

Render UIKit - React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs

NeoMutt - NeoMutt is a command-line mail reader. It's a version of https://alternativeto.

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

Mutt - Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based mail client for Unix operating systems.