Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Polycode VS Urho3D

Compare Polycode VS Urho3D and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Polycode logo Polycode

Polycode is a C++ and Lua framework for building interactive applications.

Urho3D logo Urho3D

Urho3D is a lightweight, cross-platform rendering and game engine implemented in C++ and released...
  • Polycode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-10
  • Urho3D Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Polycode features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    Polycode supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing developers to write code once and deploy it across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Polycode is available under an open-source license, which means that developers can freely use, modify, and distribute the engine's code.
  • Multi-language Support
    Polycode supports both C++ and Lua, giving developers the flexibility to choose the programming language that suits their project best.
  • Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
    Polycode comes with its own IDE, which provides a user-friendly interface for managing assets, writing code, and debugging.
  • 2D and 3D Graphics
    Polycode offers robust support for both 2D and 3D graphics, making it suitable for a wide range of game development projects.

Possible disadvantages of Polycode

  • Limited Documentation
    While Polycode has some documentation available, it is not as comprehensive as more established engines, which can make the learning curve steeper for new users.
  • Smaller Community
    Polycode has a smaller user base compared to more popular game engines, which can make finding tutorials, forums, and community support more difficult.
  • Development Activity
    The development activity of Polycode is less frequent compared to leading game engines, which can result in slower updates and fewer new features.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Polycode may lack some of the built-in features and tools that are available in more mature game engines (e.g., Unreal Engine, Unity), requiring developers to implement certain functionalities on their own.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its less extensive documentation and smaller community, new users might find it harder to learn and master Polycode compared to other game engines.

Urho3D features and specs

  • Open Source
    Urho3D is fully open-source, allowing for extensive customization and community contributions.
  • Cross-Platform
    Supports multiple platforms including Windows, MacOS, Linux, and mobile platforms, enabling wide usability.
  • Lightweight
    Urho3D is designed to be lightweight, which can result in faster performance and lower resource consumption.
  • Feature-Rich
    Includes a multitude of features such as 3D rendering, physics, animation, and scripting, making it suitable for a variety of applications.
  • Active Community
    Has an active community that contributes to its ongoing development and provides support to new users.
  • Good Documentation
    Offers comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and examples that help developers get up to speed quickly.

Possible disadvantages of Urho3D

  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to larger game engines like Unity or Unreal, Urho3D has a smaller ecosystem, which might limit the availability of plugins and third-party tools.
  • Learning Curve
    While it is well-documented, new users may still face a steep learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with C++ or game development.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    May lack some advanced features found in other, more established game engines, making it less suitable for large-scale, high-end game development.
  • Sparse Tutorials
    Although documentation is good, the number of detailed, step-by-step tutorials is relatively limited.
  • Community-Driven Pace
    The development pace can be inconsistent as it is driven largely by community contributions rather than a dedicated team.
  • Tooling
    Lacks some of the sophisticated editor tools and integrated development environments available in more mainstream engines.

Polycode videos

No Polycode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Urho3D videos

+ Add

Urho3D/UrhoSharp -- The Others Game Engine Series

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Polycode and Urho3D)

Polycode

Urho3D

Game Development
40 40%
Game Development
60% 60
Game Engine
38 38%
Game Engine
62% 62
3D Game Engine
47 47%
3D Game Engine
53% 53
2D Game Engine
100 100%
2D Game Engine
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Polycode and Urho3D. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Polycode and Urho3D

Polycode Reviews

We have no reviews of Polycode yet.
Be the first one to post

Urho3D Reviews

20 Best Scratch Alternatives 2023
Support for 3D development gives Urho3D a significant edge over Scratch for advanced programmers. Nevertheless, the platform is still highly reliable for creating 2D animations and games.
Source: rigorousthemes.com
The Top 10 Video Game Engines
Urho3D also addresses its limitations, including the fact you’ll need skills in “C++ for performance-critical code and improving existing subsystems such as networking, physics, and animation, depending on your needs.” The brief limitations list is available in full on their site.
Source: www.gamedesigning.org

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Urho3D seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Polycode mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Polycode yet. Tracking of Polycode recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Urho3D mentions (5)

  • Godot support for 3D is too primitive, and Unity has become a wild mess over the years. Is Unreal Engine the only remaining option for 3D projects?
    You might give rbfx a look. It is an actively developed fork of Urho3D that has pretty decent, and actively developed, 3D rendering. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Best library for 3D development that doesn't require GLFW/GLAD etc
    You might give rbfx a try. It's a fork of Urho3D which is also good, though aging. While they do verge into engine territory, they're not editor-based as Unity and Godot are, and in fact the editors for each are quite rudimentary and unfinished. For a programming-centric workflow, they're pretty nice. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • C++ 3D Graphics Frameworks / Game Frameworks ?
    Urho3D is a C++ engine that provides rendering (D3D, OpenGL, WebGL) as well as numerous other capabilities. Works on many platforms. Has and editor, but it is not central to the process and isn't really complete anyway. Source: about 4 years ago
  • C++ 2D/3D Engine
    Urho3D or its recent fork rbfx are good choices. Numerous supported platforms, 2D and 3D, scripting with AngelScript or Lua if desired, etc. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Workflows, Artisans, Manufactories and Inflation
    It's coded in C++, Urho3D is used to display graphics and sounds. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Polycode and Urho3D, you can also consider the following products

Unreal Engine - Unreal Engine 4 is a suite of integrated tools for game developers to design and build games, simulations, and visualizations.

Unity - The multiplatform game creation tools for everyone.

Godot Engine - Feature-packed 2D and 3D open source game engine.

GDevelop - GDevelop is an open-source game making software designed to be used by everyone.

Stencyl - Make iOS (iPhone/iPad), Android, Flash, Windows & Mac games without code using Stencyl.

CryENGINE - The most powerful game development platform is now available to everyone. Full engine source code.

Loading...