Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PocketBlocks VS React-Static

Compare PocketBlocks VS React-Static and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

PocketBlocks logo PocketBlocks

In PocketBlocks, all you need to do is drag and drop pre-built or self-customized components onto the What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) canvas to make an app, PocketBlocks helps you build an app quickly and focus on the business logic.

React-Static logo React-Static

A progressive static-site framework for React!
  • PocketBlocks Branding
    Branding //
    2024-05-21
  • PocketBlocks App Editor
    App Editor //
    2024-05-21

Openblocks + PocketBase = PocketBlocks.

PocketBlocks is an integration between Openblocks and PocketBase.

Traditionally, building an internal app requires complex frontend and backend interactions with hundreds and thousands of lines of code, not to mention work on packaging, integration, and deployment. PocketBlocks significantly reduces the work you need to do to build an app.

In PocketBlocks, all you need to do is drag and drop pre-built or self-customized components onto the What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) canvas, PocketBlocks helps you build an app quickly and focus on business logic.

Why choose PocketBlocks? Open source: Makes your ideas more feasible. High scalability: Allows you to execute JavaScript almost anywhere you would like to customize your business processes and UI components. Clean design: Follows the principles of Ant Design and supports display on screens of different sizes. We have a number of UI components, based on which you can freely build a dashboard, admin panel, and content management system (CMS).

  • React-Static Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

PocketBlocks features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

React-Static features and specs

  • Performance
    React-Static pre-renders pages and serves static files, leading to increased performance and faster load times compared to client-side rendering frameworks.
  • SEO Benefits
    By generating static pages, React-Static allows better indexing by search engines, making it more SEO-friendly than traditional single-page applications.
  • Developer Experience
    It offers a familiar React-based development experience and streamlined setup process, making it easier for developers already familiar with React.
  • Data Fetching
    React-Static supports various data fetching methods, allowing developers flexibility in pulling data from APIs or local files during build time.
  • Extensibility
    Its plugin architecture enables developers to extend functionalities, such as adding plugins for data fetching, routing, or SEO enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of React-Static

  • Build Time
    For larger sites with many pages, build times can increase significantly, which may be a drawback compared to server-side rendered solutions.
  • Dynamic Content
    Handling frequently updating or highly dynamic content can be challenging, as React-Static is optimized for static content.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more popular alternatives like Next.js, React-Static has a smaller community, which might mean fewer third-party resources and less frequent updates.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to static site generation or React, understanding the nuances of React-Static and its build routines might require additional learning.
  • Limited Use Cases
    It is primarily beneficial for static sites, which means it might not be suitable for projects requiring extensive client-side interactivity or real-time features.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PocketBlocks and React-Static)

PocketBlocks

React-Static

Developer Tools
54 54%
Developer Tools
46% 46
No Code
100 100%
No Code
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
CMS
100% 100
WYSIWYG Editors
100 100%
WYSIWYG Editors
0% 0

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing PocketBlocks and React-Static.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

PocketBlocks's answer

Open source: Makes your ideas more feasible. High scalability: Allows you to execute JavaScript almost anywhere you would like to customize your business processes and UI components. Clean design: Follows the principles of Ant Design and supports display on screens of different sizes. We have a number of UI components, based on which you can freely build a dashboard, admin panel, and content management system (CMS).

What makes your product unique?

PocketBlocks's answer

An entire low-code platform within a single binary.

How would you describe your primary audience?

PocketBlocks's answer

Developer who needs a platform to create internal tools.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

PocketBlocks's answer

Golang, Typescript, SQLite.

User comments

Share your experience with using PocketBlocks and React-Static. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, React-Static seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PocketBlocks mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PocketBlocks yet. Tracking of PocketBlocks recommendations started around May 2024.

React-Static mentions (5)

  • Django 4.0 will include a built-in Redis cache back end
    Django is still my go-to. Specifically [Django-REST-Framework](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/) with a front-end written with [react-static](https://github.com/react-static/react-static). Django's ORM is so nice and the ecosystem around it rocks. Its biggest downside is painful upgrades. They don't really follow [semantic versioning](https://semver.org/). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • react-static: anyone using or have experience with this library?
    I found a reference to react-static which looks like a nice fit for a project I'm working on but there isn't much recent activity in the repo. I'm not sure if that means it's basically done and just works or if it has fallen out of maintenance. I see it's from Tanner Linsley so that's a good endorsement on its own but just wondering if anyone has used it for production code lately. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Static site generators to watch in 2021
    I still like react-static. Minimalism on react: https://github.com/react-static/react-static. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Nice repos/tools/posts - 1st April - #1
    Link : https://github.com/react-static/react-static. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • How to create a single-page static site?
    Gatsby looks nice, but it is a no-go for reasons that I do not understand. The recommendation seems to include sapper, but svelte is not good for ClojureScript either, as it relies on mutable data. I could not find information about other alternatives to use with ClojureScript, like React-static. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PocketBlocks and React-Static, you can also consider the following products

ToolJet - Open-source alternative for Retool

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

Appsmith - Appsmith is an open source web framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards, and workflows.

Refine - A React Framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards & B2B apps with unmatched flexibilty.

Budibase - What Wordpress is to websites, Budibase is to web apps. Budibase is a free and open source web app builder for creating, launching and growing web applications. Budibase eliminates repetition and dramatically reduces development time. Check it out.

GitHub Personal Website Generator - Generate a personal website based on GitHub contributions

Loading...