Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Plane.so VS Range

Compare Plane.so VS Range and see what are their differences

Plane.so logo Plane.so

Open-source project management tool to manage issues, sprints, and product roadmaps with peace of mind.

Range logo Range

Coordination tools that teams actually love
  • Plane.so Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-31
  • Range Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

Plane.so features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Plane.so is designed with a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users of all technical levels to navigate and utilize the platform's features efficiently.
  • Collaboration Features
    The platform offers robust collaboration tools that enable teams to work together seamlessly, share updates, and manage projects in real-time.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can tailor workflows to meet the specific needs of their projects, allowing for greater flexibility and efficiency in task and project management.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Plane.so allows integration with various third-party tools and services, enhancing its functionality and enabling users to streamline their productivity processes.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to scale according to the needs of growing teams and businesses, making it suitable for both small and large organizations.

Possible disadvantages of Plane.so

  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users might experience a learning curve when initially getting accustomed to all the features and capabilities of the platform.
  • Pricing
    Some users may find that the cost associated with Plane.so's premium features is high, especially for small teams or startups on a tight budget.
  • Limited Offline Access
    The platform primarily operates online, which can be a limitation for users who need to access tools and data without an internet connection.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    While integration capabilities are robust, some functionality might depend heavily on third-party apps, which can be a downside if those apps face issues or changes.

Range features and specs

  • Enhanced Team Communication
    Range facilitates improved team communication through daily check-ins, status updates, and reporting features, which help keep everyone on the same page.
  • Integrations
    Range integrates with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and GitHub, enabling seamless workflow and data synchronization across different platforms.
  • Team Engagement
    Range's social features, like Kudos and Reflection prompts, foster a sense of team engagement and positive feedback within the organization.
  • Remote Work Friendly
    As a remote-first tool, Range is particularly beneficial for distributed teams by providing a structured way to check-in and track progress.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform boasts a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy even for non-technical team members to use effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Range

  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve as they get accustomed to the various features and functionalities of Range.
  • Cost
    The pricing might be a concern for smaller businesses or startups operating on a limited budget.
  • Limited Customization
    Range offers limited customization options which might not cater to the specific needs of every team or organization.
  • Potential Over-Reliance on Tool
    Teams might become overly reliant on the tool for communication, potentially reducing spontaneous interaction and informal check-ins.
  • Integration Complexity
    While integration is a pro, it can also be a con if not set up properly, as improper configuration can lead to disruptions in workflow.

Analysis of Range

Overall verdict

  • Range is a good solution for teams looking to enhance their collaboration and streamline their workflow processes. Its user-friendly interface and integration capabilities make it a valuable tool for improving communication and ensuring everyone is on the same page.

Why this product is good

  • Range (range.co) is known for its effectiveness in facilitating team communication and productivity. It offers a platform for daily check-ins, status updates, and meeting management, which helps distributed teams stay aligned and focused. The tool integrates with popular services like Slack, GitHub, and Asana, making it convenient for teams already using these platforms.

Recommended for

    Range is recommended for remote and distributed teams, project managers, and organizations seeking to improve team engagement and transparency. It's particularly beneficial for teams that rely heavily on asynchronous communication and those adopting agile methodologies.

Plane.so videos

No Plane.so videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Range videos

Top Rated 30" Gas Ranges | Range Review

More videos:

  • Review - New Range Rover FULL in-depth review – the ultimate luxury SUV? | What Car?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Plane.so and Range)
Project Management
37 37%
63% 63
Productivity
23 23%
77% 77
Task Management
43 43%
57% 57
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Plane.so and Range. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Plane.so and Range

Plane.so Reviews

We have no reviews of Plane.so yet.
Be the first one to post

Range Reviews

8 Geekbot Alternatives for Better Standups
Range isn't just about running standups; it's about cultivating a connected, transparent, and aligned team. If you're looking to go beyond management and truly understand your team, Range is an innovative choice that goes beyond the status quo.
Source: www.spinach.io
Dailybot Alternatives: Comparing 6 Daily Standup Tools for 2024
My View: Especially useful for teams using multiple communication tools. Range ensures clarity and uniformity, making it easier to manage distributed teams. Some may like Range’s separate web app, others may see it as tool proliferation. It’ll depend on your team’s own preferences.
6 Geekbot Alternatives: Comparing Async Daily Standup Software in 2023
Transforming stand-ups into check-ins, Range provides its own interface to keep everyone informed and connected.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Plane.so should be more popular than Range. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Plane.so mentions (12)

  • Adventures in Homelabbing: From Cloud Obsession to Self-Hosted Shenanigans
    I began to self-host a Minecraft server using Crafty Controller, an Excalidraw instance, Docmost to replace Notion, Plane to replace Jira, and Penpot to replace Figma. To be able to access them from the internet, I used Nginx Proxy Manager to set up reverse proxies with SSL. You can use Traefik or Caddy instead, but I enjoyed the ease-of-use of NPM. For a dashboard solution, I started with Homarr, but later... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Our Story of Building an Open-Core PM tool: Growing from 2 to 30 People, 30K+ GitHub Stars, to 500K+ Docker pulls
    Hi! I'm Vihar, co-founder and COO at Plane. This is my third startup - before Plane, I worked as a developer and marketer at several established organizations. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Comparison of file and component structures among Shadcn-ui, Plane.so and Gitroom.
    As you can see, router only has one file name page.tsx and that’s it. We see in shadcn-ui where it contains components specific to a route that are scoped to that route, similarly in plane.so, it has route specific header.tsx along with page.tsx however, one commonality in all of these projects is that there is a components folder that can be reused or specific to a feature depending on the folder name. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Plane, open-source Jira alternative, got to 100K+ Docker and 44K+ K8s deploys
    So, we have got the following project management software (including plane.so) on HN main page in the last 48 hours: - https://www.openproject.org/ - https://worklenz.com/ - https://plane.so/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Worklenz: Open-Source, All in one project management tool
    There was another one on the front page recently called Plane (https://plane.so). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Range mentions (2)

  • Daily scrum apps for Microsoft Teams?
    My team uses range.co which integrates with MSTeam (or GSuite/Slack if that's your jam). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best time for distributed team meetings?
    Check out something like https://range.co/ for distributed teams check-ins. These meetings are about progress and removing blockers, not so much making sure all butts are in chairs at the same time. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Plane.so and Range, you can also consider the following products

Linear - Streamlined issue tracking for software teams

Standuply - Run daily standup meetings and track your metrics in Slack

Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.

Aident.ai - Aiden automates and streamlines standup meetings, integrating with your team's tools and providing AI-driven task management. Our tests showed a 60% reduction in meeting time and much more efficient task management upon adoption.

Jira - The #1 software development tool used by agile teams. Jira Software is built for every member of your software team to plan, track, and release great software.

Geekbot - Discover how to organise asynchronous stand up meetings in Slack and keep your team synced using Geekbot. Start your free trial today!