Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PingTester VS Graphical Ping

Compare PingTester VS Graphical Ping and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

PingTester logo PingTester

PingTester can store a rundown of IP addresses and system test charges to expand the working effectiveness, perform ping and traceroute test by a single tick, ‘ping clear’ subnets or interim ping every one of the hosts on a rundown constantly, spare…

Graphical Ping logo Graphical Ping

Graphical Ping displays a color coded realtime graph of continuous pings to a specified host.
  • PingTester Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
  • Graphical Ping Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-19

PingTester features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    PingTester features an intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and access its functionalities without a steep learning curve.
  • Comprehensive Features
    The tool offers a wide range of features such as ping testing, traceroute, and DNS lookup, providing a holistic network diagnostic capability.
  • Customizable Options
    Users can customize tests and parameters according to their needs, allowing for more tailored and specific network assessments.
  • Reporting and Logging
    PingTester generates detailed reports and logs, which are useful for tracking performance over time and diagnosing recurring network issues.

Possible disadvantages of PingTester

  • Limited OS Compatibility
    PingTester may not be compatible with all operating systems, limiting its usability across different devices and platforms.
  • Potential Costs
    Some advanced features might only be available in paid versions of the tool, which could be a barrier for users seeking a fully free solution.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple tests simultaneously can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting the performance of the system it's running on.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    The effectiveness of PingTester is heavily reliant on an active internet connection, which could pose issues for offline diagnostics.

Graphical Ping features and specs

  • Visual Representation
    Graphical Ping provides a visual representation of ping results, making it easier to understand network latency and potential issues.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It offers real-time monitoring of network connections, allowing users to see current network performance instantly.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The interface is designed to be intuitive, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize various settings such as ping intervals and visual displays to suit their specific needs.
  • Multi-host Support
    Graphical Ping allows monitoring of multiple hosts simultaneously, providing a comprehensive overview of network performance.

Possible disadvantages of Graphical Ping

  • Resource Usage
    The application might consume more system resources compared to command-line tools, which could be a concern on less powerful hardware.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While suitable for basic monitoring, it may lack advanced diagnostic features present in other network analysis tools.
  • Platform Dependency
    Being a graphical application, it might have limitations in compatibility across different operating systems or require specific platforms to run.
  • Cost Implication
    If not free, users might have to consider the cost associated with purchasing or subscribing to the software.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, users may experience a learning curve when trying to utilize more complex functionalities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PingTester and Graphical Ping)

PingTester

Graphical Ping

Monitoring Tools
37 37%
Monitoring Tools
63% 63
OS & Utilities
40 40%
OS & Utilities
60% 60
Security
45 45%
Security
55% 55
Log Management
28 28%
Log Management
72% 72

User comments

Share your experience with using PingTester and Graphical Ping. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Graphical Ping seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PingTester mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PingTester yet. Tracking of PingTester recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Graphical Ping mentions (1)

  • Random short lag spikes?
    If you are more a GUI guy: When I'm interested in a time series of ping times, I use http://gping.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PingTester and Graphical Ping, you can also consider the following products

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

Fping (open source) - fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

OpenSpeedTest - Broadband Internet Speed Test Unlocked!

PingDoctor - PingDoctor is software that is considered to be the most powerful and easiest to use network route analyzer.

Loading...