Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Open Nettest VS Graphical Ping

Compare Open Nettest VS Graphical Ping and see what are their differences

Open Nettest logo Open Nettest

Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

Graphical Ping logo Graphical Ping

Graphical Ping displays a color coded realtime graph of continuous pings to a specified host.
  • Open Nettest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-16
  • Graphical Ping Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-19

Open Nettest features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Open Nettest provides a straightforward and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise to test their internet connectivity.
  • Comprehensive Metrics
    The tool offers detailed insights into various connectivity metrics, such as download and upload speeds, latency, and packet loss, providing a comprehensive view of network performance.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    Open Nettest is available across multiple platforms, including web browsers and mobile devices, ensuring users can test connectivity across different devices seamlessly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Open Nettest allows users and developers to access and modify the source code, fostering transparency and community-driven improvements.
  • No Cost
    Open Nettest is free to use, making it an economical choice for individuals and organizations looking to monitor their internet performance without incurring additional costs.

Possible disadvantages of Open Nettest

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While offering essential metrics, Open Nettest might lack some of the advanced features and analytics tools available in specialized network testing solutions.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As an online tool, the accuracy and reliability of tests can be affected by transient network issues or heavy load on the test server.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Users may have concerns regarding data privacy and how the information collected during tests is stored and used, despite it being an open-source tool.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, support may primarily come from the community, which might not be as prompt or structured as professional support services.
  • Variable Server Locations
    The results can vary widely depending on the test server's location, which might not always reflect the most accurate representation of a user's actual everyday internet performance.

Graphical Ping features and specs

  • Visual Representation
    Graphical Ping provides a visual representation of ping results, making it easier to understand network latency and potential issues.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It offers real-time monitoring of network connections, allowing users to see current network performance instantly.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The interface is designed to be intuitive, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize various settings such as ping intervals and visual displays to suit their specific needs.
  • Multi-host Support
    Graphical Ping allows monitoring of multiple hosts simultaneously, providing a comprehensive overview of network performance.

Possible disadvantages of Graphical Ping

  • Resource Usage
    The application might consume more system resources compared to command-line tools, which could be a concern on less powerful hardware.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While suitable for basic monitoring, it may lack advanced diagnostic features present in other network analysis tools.
  • Platform Dependency
    Being a graphical application, it might have limitations in compatibility across different operating systems or require specific platforms to run.
  • Cost Implication
    If not free, users might have to consider the cost associated with purchasing or subscribing to the software.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, users may experience a learning curve when trying to utilize more complex functionalities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Nettest and Graphical Ping)
Monitoring Tools
57 57%
43% 43
Security
62 62%
38% 38
OS & Utilities
52 52%
48% 48
Log Management
49 49%
51% 51

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Nettest and Graphical Ping. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Graphical Ping seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Nettest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open Nettest yet. Tracking of Open Nettest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Graphical Ping mentions (1)

  • Random short lag spikes?
    If you are more a GUI guy: When I'm interested in a time series of ping times, I use http://gping.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Nettest and Graphical Ping, you can also consider the following products

Fping (open source) - fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

OpenSpeedTest - Broadband Internet Speed Test Unlocked!

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

NetTK - NetTK, Network Tool Kit, is an Open Source alternative for monitoring and troubleshooting your...

PingDoctor - PingDoctor is software that is considered to be the most powerful and easiest to use network route analyzer.