Pijul VS Travis CI
Compare Pijul VS Travis CI and see what are their differences
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
featured
Pijul
Mercurial SCM
darcs
Bazaar
Git
Fossil
GitHub Desktop
Gitless
Travis CI
Jenkins
CircleCI
Codeship
Buddy
Bitrise
Bamboo
TeamCity
Travis CINo Pijul videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Pijul should be more popular than Travis CI. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In Pijul, conflicts are not modelled as a "failure to merge", but rather as the standard case. Specifically, conflicts happen between two changes, and are solved by one change. The resolution change solves the conflict between the same two changes, no matter if other changes have been made concurrently. Once solved, conflicts never come back. - from https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you will see it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself -- what Pijul users say when they overhear git users arguing with each other about monorepos. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I believe that handling merges like this correctly was a motive for designing pijul: https://pijul.org See the item on the splash page about 'merge correctness'. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find the post detailing the behavior with a bit of searching. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Darcs [0] patch theory was a predecessor to OTs/CRDTs (and a predecessor to git as well; in some ways it is the "smart" to which git was named "dumb"). When it works and performs well it is still sometimes version control magic. Pijul [1] is an interesting experiment to watch, trying to keep the patch theory flag flying and also trying to bring in updates from OTs and CRDTs as it can. [0] https://darcs.net [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
IMHO the only really interesting alternative to Git currently is Pijul (https://pijul.org) as it is not a more-or-less Git clone but a different approach to the problem itself. Pijul allows for very interesting development and ci/cd workflows. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
We used Travis CI for our continuous integration (CI) pipeline. Travis is a highly popular CI on Github and its build matrix feature is useful for repositories which contain multiple projects like Grab's. We configured Travis to do the following:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
CI/CD for autobuild + autotests (Codemagic or Travis CI). Source: over 1 year ago
Step 2: Log on to Travis CI and sign up with your GitHub account used above. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Some other hosted CI products, such as CircleCI and Travis Cl, are completely hosted in the cloud. It is becoming more popular for small organizations to use hosted CI products, as they allow engineering teams to begin continuous integration as soon as possible. Source: almost 3 years ago
1. Let's create the account. Access the site https://travis-ci.com/ and click on the button Sign up. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.
CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
Bazaar - Bazaar is a tool for helping people collaborate.
Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.