Based on our record, Pro Git should be more popular than Pijul. It has been mentiond 280 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In Pijul, conflicts are not modelled as a "failure to merge", but rather as the standard case. Specifically, conflicts happen between two changes, and are solved by one change. The resolution change solves the conflict between the same two changes, no matter if other changes have been made concurrently. Once solved, conflicts never come back. - from https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you will see it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself -- what Pijul users say when they overhear git users arguing with each other about monorepos. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
I believe that handling merges like this correctly was a motive for designing pijul: https://pijul.org See the item on the splash page about 'merge correctness'. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find the post detailing the behavior with a bit of searching. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Darcs [0] patch theory was a predecessor to OTs/CRDTs (and a predecessor to git as well; in some ways it is the "smart" to which git was named "dumb"). When it works and performs well it is still sometimes version control magic. Pijul [1] is an interesting experiment to watch, trying to keep the patch theory flag flying and also trying to bring in updates from OTs and CRDTs as it can. [0] https://darcs.net [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
IMHO the only really interesting alternative to Git currently is Pijul (https://pijul.org) as it is not a more-or-less Git clone but a different approach to the problem itself. Pijul allows for very interesting development and ci/cd workflows. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
The first couple of chapters of the "Git Book" should be a useful guide. Source: 5 months ago
Absolutely. Imo, the book on the official git website was the best resource that helped me understand and learn to use git. Source: 5 months ago
Including the git user manual [1] and the git book [2]? People tend to skip over those and go straight to the reference/manpages. 1. https://git-scm.com/docs/user-manual 2. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Stumbled upon the book pro-git and started reading it.It is a second edition from 2014. Source: 9 months ago
Are there any good training sessions on GIT (not GitHub) out there? All I can find is the Git Book, but it's frankly a fairly dry read and kinda a firehose of information to digest. Would love a O'Reilly book or something. Source: 10 months ago
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
Learn Git Branching - "Learn Git Branching" is the most visual and interactive way to learn Git on the web; you'll be challenged with exciting levels, given step-by-step demonstrations of powerful features, and maybe even have a bit of fun along the way.
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Bazaar - Bazaar is a tool for helping people collaborate.
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.