Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Picnic CSS VS Foundation

Compare Picnic CSS VS Foundation and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Picnic CSS logo Picnic CSS

Lightweight and beautiful library. Unpack your meal and start coding.

Foundation logo Foundation

The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
  • Picnic CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-07
  • Foundation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-20

Picnic CSS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Picnic CSS is designed to be lightweight, ensuring fast load times with minimal impact on page performance.
  • Minimalist Design
    Picnic CSS promotes a clean and simple aesthetic, making it suitable for modern web applications that favor minimalism.
  • Responsive Out of the Box
    The framework is built with responsiveness in mind, allowing developers to create mobile-friendly interfaces without extra configuration.
  • No Dependencies
    Picnic CSS does not require any dependencies such as JavaScript libraries, making it easy to integrate into projects.
  • Ease of Use
    The framework is straightforward and easy to use, allowing developers to quickly prototype and build applications.

Possible disadvantages of Picnic CSS

  • Limited Components
    Picnic CSS offers a limited set of pre-defined components compared to larger frameworks, which can restrict design possibilities.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    The framework may not include advanced CSS features or animations that more comprehensive frameworks might offer.
  • Smaller Community
    Picnic CSS has a smaller user base, which can result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
  • Customization Limitations
    While it provides basic styling, users looking for extensive customization might find the framework limiting compared to others.

Foundation features and specs

  • Customizability
    Foundation offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to adjust the framework to meet specific project requirements.
  • Responsive Design
    Foundation is built with mobile-first design principles, ensuring that applications look and function well on a variety of devices and screen sizes.
  • Semantic Code
    The framework encourages the use of semantic HTML, making code more readable and improving accessibility.
  • Range of Components
    Foundation provides a wide array of pre-built components such as buttons, forms, and navigation bars, which can accelerate development time.
  • Strong Community Support
    The Foundation community is active and provides extensive documentation, forums, and additional resources to help developers.
  • Flex Grid
    Foundation's Flex Grid system provides a powerful and flexible way to create responsive layouts that adapt to different screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages of Foundation

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, Foundation can have a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • Size
    The full-featured version of Foundation can be quite large, potentially slowing down load times if not optimized properly.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    While generally robust, Foundation has been known to have occasional compatibility issues with certain browsers, necessitating additional fixes.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Foundation relies on jQuery for several of its components, which can be seen as outdated or unnecessary by some modern developers.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller projects, Foundation might be overkill in terms of features and setup, making simpler frameworks or no framework a more optimal choice.

Picnic CSS videos

No Picnic CSS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Foundation videos

+ Add

BEST & WORST NEW FOUNDATIONS

More videos:

  • Review - BEST & WORST NEW FOUNDATIONS
  • Review - BEST & WORST FOUNDATIONS | Luxury & Drugstore

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Picnic CSS and Foundation)

Picnic CSS

Foundation

Developer Tools
11 11%
Developer Tools
89% 89
Design Tools
9 9%
Design Tools
91% 91
CSS Framework
10 10%
CSS Framework
90% 90
Development Tools
12 12%
Development Tools
88% 88

User comments

Share your experience with using Picnic CSS and Foundation. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Picnic CSS and Foundation

Picnic CSS Reviews

We have no reviews of Picnic CSS yet.
Be the first one to post

Foundation Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
The reason I picked Foundation for this list is its strong emphasis on creating responsive designs, a feature that many developers value in the era of mobile browsing. This framework differentiates itself with an ingrained mobile-first approach, ensuring that applications look great on smaller screens without sacrificing functionality or aesthetics on larger ones.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Semantic, coherent, and fully customizable, the Foundation empowers developers to create designs that are not only visually appealing but also adaptable to various screen sizes. Starting with small devices, developers can gradually enhance the complexity of their designs, ensuring a fully responsive experience layer by layer.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Not only this, but they also have ‘Foundation for Emails’, which is a framework to code responsive HTML emails. Hence, whenever you are looking for an alternative to Bootstrap, do give Foundation a try.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Foundation is a responsive front-end framework with CSS and JavaScript components for building modern, mobile-friendly websites. It offers a comprehensive toolkit with a modular approach, allowing developers to customize and tailor their designs to meet specific project requirements.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
One of the most advanced and sophisticated UI frameworks, Foundation enables quick website development. Just like Bootstrap, Foundation follows a mobile-first approach and is fully responsive. It is very suitable for huge web applications that need a lot of styling. Foundation is customizable, flexible, and semantic. And, there are over 2k contributors on Github and decent...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Foundation seems to be a lot more popular than Picnic CSS. While we know about 21 links to Foundation, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Picnic CSS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Picnic CSS mentions (2)

Foundation mentions (21)

  • Blazor #3 - How to Install Foundation into a Blazor Project
    Foundation is a mobile-first responsive front-end framework that provides a range of CSS and JavaScript components for creating websites quickly. It’s often seen as a competitor to Bootstrap, offering more flexibility and customization options. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Foundation: An easy-to-use, powerful, and flexible front-end framework for building web applications on any device. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: LangCSS – An AI Assistant for Tailwind
    Here is a thought you might want to consider and see if it makes sense. This is personal, but I also believe this is where design codes (especially CSS) are going to go. It is not going to be Tailwind or more new frameworks. Honestly, I think all of these Bootstrap, Foundation, and Tailwind, etc. Are like middle-layer abstractions are for designs that are neither small nor large. Bootstrap won because of the... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Foundation is another popular open-source front-end framework, similar to Bootstrap, but with its own set of features and design principles. It was created by ZURB a design and development company in 2011. And is also maintained by a community of developers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • I hate CSS: how can I build UIs?
    Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Picnic CSS and Foundation, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Bulma - Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Bootstrap Zero - Open-source, free Bootstrap templates collection.

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Loading...