Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Phabricator VS BuildMaster

Compare Phabricator VS BuildMaster and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Phabricator logo Phabricator

Phacility - Phabricator

BuildMaster logo BuildMaster

BuildMaster Software is an application release automation software that also specializes in release management. It was designed by Inedo, a software development company. Read more about BuildMaster.
  • Phabricator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13
  • BuildMaster Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Phabricator features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Phabricator offers a wide range of tools including code review, repository hosting, bug tracking, project management, and more, all integrated into one platform.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize workflows, forms, and other aspects to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Powerful Code Review
    Phabricator provides advanced code review features like inline comments, custom fields, and audit trails, making it a robust tool for maintaining code quality.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Phabricator allows organizations to host their instance, providing control over data and customizations without licensing fees.
  • Multi-repository Support
    It supports multiple version control systems (Git, Mercurial, and Subversion) and allows managing multiple repositories within the same project.

Possible disadvantages of Phabricator

  • Complex Setup
    Phabricator can be challenging to install and configure, requiring a good level of technical knowledge and infrastructure.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find it difficult to navigate and use all the features due to its extensive functionalities and less intuitive user interface.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    Compared to other platforms, Phabricator has fewer integrations with third-party tools, which might be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Phacility's Future
    Phacility announced that they will cease operations, which means the future maintenance and updates of Phabricator could be uncertain.
  • Performance Issues
    For large-scale projects with many users and repositories, Phabricator may experience performance issues and could require significant resources to run smoothly.

BuildMaster features and specs

  • Unified Build and Release
    BuildMaster integrates both building and releasing of code, offering a seamless workflow from development to production.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports multiple platforms and technologies, making it versatile for different development environments and applications.
  • Pipeline Automation
    Enables automation of CI/CD pipelines which can increase efficiency and reduce manual errors.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Provides the ability to create customizable workflows tailored to the specific needs of an organization.
  • Integration with Various Tools
    Offers integration capabilities with popular development tools and version control systems, enhancing its usability within existing toolchains.
  • Self-hosted On-Premise Option
    Provides the option for on-premise installation, which can be beneficial for organizations with strict compliance or data security requirements.

Possible disadvantages of BuildMaster

  • Learning Curve
    May have a steep learning curve, especially for those unfamiliar with automated build and release processes.
  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and might require detailed planning and understanding of the system.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a self-hosted server might require significant resources and maintenance efforts from the IT team.
  • Cost
    Licensing costs for BuildMaster might be prohibitive for smaller companies or startups with limited budgets.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more widely used open-source alternatives, the community support and third-party resources available for BuildMaster are limited.

Phabricator videos

Phabricator code review session at Wikimedia Hackathon Zurich

More videos:

  • Review - Phabricator and Lando Brownbag July 2 2018
  • Review - Nizameddin Ordulu - Phabricator: An all-in-one tool for code review

BuildMaster videos

TJ Reviews: United EX Buildmaster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Phabricator and BuildMaster)
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Phabricator and BuildMaster. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Phabricator and BuildMaster

Phabricator Reviews

We have no reviews of Phabricator yet.
Be the first one to post

BuildMaster Reviews

10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
BuildMaster may not be as well-known as some Jenkins alternatives in this guide, but it certainly isn’t any less capable of providing users with high-quality features for CI/CD. Getting everything set up isn’t too difficult and there are even online tutorials available on their website.
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
BuildMaster by Inedo is one of the best Jenkins alternatives that offers continuous integration on different platforms. With BuildMaster, you can manage your apps and deploy them to the environment without any hassle. Moreover, it doesn’t require extensive expertise to set up the pipelines.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Phabricator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Phabricator mentions (3)

  • Migrating from Phabricator to Azure Devops. Have some questions.
    My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Is there any "Unified HUB SOlution" in this Microservices era?
    You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Is there an alternative to open project with the next characteristics ?
    Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: about 4 years ago

BuildMaster mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BuildMaster yet. Tracking of BuildMaster recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Phabricator and BuildMaster, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Octopus Deploy - Octopus is a friendly deployment automation tool for .NET developers.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.